With the wedding of Patrick and Emma Kelly occurring in
June, 1900, the chances of capturing their information as married couple in the
Fort Wayne 1900
census was rather slim. But it would be so helpful if it were there—and yet,
even more helpful if Patrick’s wife could be identified separately as Emma Brown, as she was shown on the marriage license in Allen County.
Fortunately, in my quest to match any link between the Brown
surname and the Kelly name, I did locate the couple in the 1900 census.
Thankfully, the date in which the survey team arrived in Patrick’s neighborhood
was a bit after the couple’s wedding date. Enumerator George B. Irwin canvassed
West Williams Street
in Fort Wayne
on June 29—ample time for the newlyweds to set up housekeeping there.
There on the page, preserved now for all to see, was the Kelly household. Patrick, as head of household, was listed as born in July,
1869. Just as his sister Mary’s listing appeared subsequent to her 1900
marriage, Patrick was listed as being married for zero years, as was his wife.
Emma’s listing showed her birth occurring in September, 1874—like
her husband, also in Indiana.
Since the 1900 census inquired into how many children each woman had borne,
Emma’s report showed her the mother of one child, still living.
And, to confirm the speculations on the Brown surname Emma
was married under, just below her census entry appeared that of two-year-old
Frederick Brown, born January, 1898, to parents who were both listed as Indiana natives.
Telling the rest of the tale was the entry delineating the
relationship between Patrick as head of household and the child, Frederick:
that of step-son.
That helps explain why Emma was married under the surname
Brown while the newspaper reports showed her sister, as maid of honor, named “Miss
Kaher.” But don’t think it will be as simple a matter as seeking a Kaher family
in the Logansport
area. Best I can tell, there wasn’t one. And if there were a Kaher family
there, related to our Emma, how would we be able to confirm that? The report in
The Fort Wayne News didn’t include
Miss Kaher’s first name.
On the other hand, what if the correct maid of honor’s name
was May Reseberger, as The Fort Wayne
Sentinel had it? Do we assume that name was the one to which we should
apply the relationship of sisterhood? Or was the sister label entirely
misinformed?
Ah, the view gets clearer. :)
ReplyDeleteActually, it's such a relief when that stuff surfaces. I really have this deep need to have things explained...
DeleteWell that explains that! :)
ReplyDeleteAnd, of course, leads to still more questions :)
Delete