With momentous discoveries found in newspaper accounts, I’m faced
with a dilemma: do I believe every word—or recall the many past times in which
the newspaper got it wrong?
Consider this case. I’m researching a man with a name so
common, it renders him near invisible. How do I differentiate my John Kelly from all the other Irish
immigrants sporting the very same name? I have a vested interest in paying
attention to every last detail I can find on his wife, who thankfully was
bestowed with a less-common name than her husband.
As you can see from yesterday’s post, in finding Johanna Kelly’s obituary, I found a treasure chest filled with little tidbits. The
obituary included her Fort Wayne
address, confirming I had the right Johanna Kelly—just in case there was any
doubt. Even though he passed away eleven years prior to her death, John Kelly’s
name was included, along with his identification as her husband. There is no
question I’ve gotten the right person.
But what about some of the other details? While I can
confirm that her grown children’s names are correct, the statement that Johanna had
been in the United States
since 1870 is not entirely so. Well, yes, she was in America
in 1870 onward, but she had to have arrived in Fort Wayne before the birth of her son Patrick
in July, 1869. Did Johanna actually forget where she gave birth to her son? Or
did the family just round the date up from his birthday to the next nearest year (only six months
away)? Toying around with little details
like this doesn’t improve upon that confidence level.
So when I came to that momentous discovery in her obituary—that
she was a native of County Kerry and had “several sisters and brothers” surviving
her who still lived in Ireland—I
wasn’t sure what to do. Do the genealogy happy dance for finding the exact
county of her origin? Include a few shrieks of “Eureka” for discovering that there were
additional siblings still there? Or wonder whether any of it was even
believable?
You know how I am about mistakes in newspapers.
I’m not sure it helped, now that I subscribe to various
other historic newspaper archives, to discover there was a second version of
Johanna Falvey Kelly’s obituary. It seemed to be a re-hash of the same basic
information I had already found, years ago, in the microfilmed version of the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette obituary.
Knowing how easy it seems to be for newspapers to get the
story wrong, I turned a sharp eye to the copy printed on page ten of The Fort Wayne Weekly Sentinel that May
6 in 1903. Take a look at it for yourself. You’ll see the Sentinel said basically the same thing about Johanna as their
competitor had printed.
Or did it?
Take another look. You’ll see I now have a couple other
discrepancies to add to the list:
·
Brothers and sisters? Or sisters only?
·
Survivors in Ireland only? Or—what?—a sister in New Zealand?
Whichever result turns out to be true, I’m even more eager
to press onward to the preceding generation. Wouldn’t it be just stellar to
discover not only distant cousins in Ireland,
but some in New Zealand
as well?
I’m already beginning to wonder how two parts of the same
family could head in such radically different directions when leaving their
homeland.
Mrs. Johanna Kelly, for thirty-three years a resident of this city, died shortly after 6 o’clock this morning at her home, 1919 Hoagland avenue, at the advanced age of 77 years.Deceased was taken ill on Easter Sunday with bronchitis, which culminated in her death today. She was born in County Kerry, Ireland, but came to America with her husband, John Kelly, in 1870, locating in Fort Wayne the same year, and has resided in this city continuously since that time.The husband died about eleven years ago. Three children survive—Mrs. P. H. Phillips and P. T. and J. J. Kelly, of this city. There are also several sisters living in Ireland and one in New Zealand. Mrs. Kelly was very widely known and had many friends.The funeral services will be held Monday morning at 8:30 from the residence and at 9 o'clock from St. Patrick's church, of which the deceased was a devout member.
These little discrepancies wouldn't bother me. Rounding up and estimating are common enough, especially when the events took place many years before, and probably even more common when the person reporting wasn't even a part of the event. Certainly the New Zealand piece must have been true because it's such an odd tidbit that the writer couldn't possibly have confused other reported information.
ReplyDeleteWendy, thanks for the encouragement. Good point about the New Zealand detail...and wouldn't it be fun to search for descendants in New Zealand? ;)
DeleteEven if it is written in stone it might be wrong.
ReplyDeleteOh...I see you've run across some of those headstones, too, Grant!
Deletehttp://natlib.govt.nz/items?i[subject][]=Napier&i[subject][]=Falvey+Family&il[collection]=Bibliography+of+Published+New+Zealand+Family+Histories&il[primary_collection]=findNZarticles&il[subject]=Ireland
ReplyDeleteNow that would be worth reading! :)
DeleteWhat a great link! As always, you are amazing, Iggy! Thanks for finding that!
DeleteNew Zealand..now that is a trip to look forward to! :)
ReplyDeleteYes, definitely! But...Ireland first! :D
Delete