When faced with multiple ancestors sporting the same given
name, it’s sometimes challenging to determine which one is which. Perhaps the
best defense is to identify each identically-named ancestor in more than one
way. Just as a hand slips easily into a well-fit glove, determining multiple
qualifiers for each individual helps finger the right one.
That, at least, seemed like a sound idea when I thought to
apply it to my William Tilson family in Washington
County, Virginia.
After having followed his sons to—and this detail does not help the
differentiation effort—Washington County, Tennessee,
William had returned to his old farm in Virginia, where his daughter Janet now
lived with her husband, Joseph Cole.
Sounds easy, right? I have two additional identifying
relationships to connect with this William
to assure I have the right people.
All would have gone swimmingly, if only there were but one Joseph Cole. Apparently, there wasn’t.
Now the task begins to find multiple identifiers to finger
the right Joseph Cole. I turned back to the Mercer Tilson genealogy book to
pick up some clues. According to The Tilson Genealogy, Janet Tilson—likely born in 1776—had married Joseph Cole
and continued to live in the area on what was noted to be “the original William
Tilson farm.”
According to that genealogy, the couple had three children.
In addition to unnamed twin daughters, for whom no date of birth was supplied, the
couple had a son, whom they named Sampson.
An additional note by the author stated his date of birth
was “perhaps 1810.”
When trying to gather multiple identifiers for an
individual, “perhaps” doesn’t cut it.
“Oh,” you say, “Sampson isn’t that common a given name; this
will be sufficient.”
Ya think?
Let’s check Find A Grave to see what trouble is headed our
way. Fortunately, the Mercer Tilson narrative includes a separate entry for the
son of Joseph and Janet, indicating that Sampson died “about” 1894, and that he
was buried in Lutheran Church Cemetery
in Saint Clair, Virginia. The book also mentions that he was
married to Eliza Cole, and includes the names of several children, so we should
have several means of identifying the right man.
Right away, we find an entry for a Sampson Cole who was born
“perhaps” in 1810 and died “about” 1894—actually, 1811 and 1893. I’d call that
close.
While he might have been listed as having a wife named Eliza
Cole (check) and several children, some of whose names from the Tilson
genealogy matched the Find A Grave listing (check), unfortunately, the helpful
Find A Grave volunteer who created Sampson Cole’s memorial noted that Sampson
was son of David Mason Cole and Remember Woolsey.
Wrong.
So much for finding the qualifier to help us identify the
right Joseph Cole who married William Tilson’s daughter, Janet. The more we
struggle with these details, the tighter the snare seems to shut.
Perhaps there was a different
Sampson Cole who was son of Joseph and Janet. After all, not being sure whether
the “Lutheran Church Cemetery”
in the old village designation, “Saint Clair,” would be the same as the Saint
James Lutheran Church Cemetery where this Sampson Cole was buried, perhaps I
should be looking for a different Sampson.
Using the search engine at Find A Grave, I entered my
parameters for any Sampson Cole who died before 1899—just to give a little
leeway—and was buried in Virginia. The results handed me a list of four gentlemen by that same name, none of whom had dates of birth or death remotely
close to my possibilities—other than the Sampson we’d already located, of
course.
Though I had been hoping that a Sampson, married to an
Eliza, who was son of Joseph, who was husband of Janet, might provide enough
variables to point me in the right direction, that is not how this search is
turning out. Apparently—and yes, even with a name like Sampson—it takes more
details than these to ascertain that we are talking about the right
individual.
It's interesting that the name Remember keeps popping up. Is it possible the Findagrave volunteer had wrong information? It seems that somebody's assumptions in the past have become facts, "facts" which are throwing you off.
ReplyDeleteIt would be nice if Find A Grave volunteers could also note the source of their assertions on the website. I'm not sure how that name, Remember, keeps showing up, Wendy, but that is a good point. And it is throwing me off. Using others' work as trailblazers is handy, but this points out, once again, why the ultimate "buck stops here" has to be that of documentation. Period.
DeleteEither the book or Find A Grave appears to be wrong - the Find A Grave record shows some possible supporting evidence.
ReplyDeleteOr perhaps Sampson was from a 2nd or 3d wife?
Thanks for seconding my thoughts on this, Iggy! My guess, at this point, is that the book may not be correct.
DeleteI'm not sure how writers of early 1900s genealogies went about gathering all their information--a formidable task, if you think of it, considering they had no access to the tools of technology that we have now--but if it was through questionnaires sent out to various family members, perhaps some well-meaning relatives sought to "help out" by filling in the blanks for other family members who neglected to reply at all. Not everyone remembers every detail of their relatives' children and their dates of birth. There were bound to be mistakes replicated through a method like that.
Remember keeps popping up...gosh I like that name. Eventually you will sort it out.
ReplyDeleteAs we push into that old Puritan era and region, the names sure do change, don't they?
DeleteThanks for the encouragement, Far Side. I'm sure something else will show up to give a hint.