John Laskowski must have been a steady guy. Firstborn son of
Anton and Mary Laskowski, he arrived in the family’s Polish household in August
of 1880. Along with the rest of his family—his two siblings Michko and Sophia
arrived in short order—he made the trip west to a German port and then aboard a
ship bound for America. By the time of the 1892 New
York State census, he
was living with his family in an apartment in Brooklyn.
John seemed to be the solid type who latched on to tradition
and held fast. He found and married a Polish girl from the neighborhood where
he grew up—“Blanche” Aktabowska—and raised the customary large Catholic family
of at least six children.
Unlike either of his siblings, John kept the surname he
arrived with. It wasn’t hard to find him in any of the subsequent federal
census enumerations, or the available state census records. Working as a
common laborer, he lived the rest of his days in his adopted homeland—varying
the location only so much as to move from one New York City borough to another. His 1930 death
being registered in Manhattan may only be a
factor of which hospital he was taken to; his last noted residence was in Queens.
In sharp contrast, my grandmother—his sister Sophia—seemed to
want to have nothing to do with her outmoded Polish roots. Though she may well
have married a good Polish boy, there was nothing left of that telltale surname
sign to alert me to the fact. Gone was the Polish surname. In its place arose a
solid, respectable Irish name. Even the “Sophia” was gone—my grandmother opting
for the more modern (or at least American) sounding “Sophie.”
Likewise, Sophie’s younger brother shed the telltale “-ski”
from his surname, and disappeared into the American melting pot, allegedly
under the name of Lasko. The “Michko” nickname showing in the 1892 census
evolved into the more acceptable “Michael.”
It took a lot of searching—coupled with futile prying into
the sealed family business that the older generation seemed to have vowed never
to reveal—to even discover that Sophie had
a maiden name, and that it was Laskowska. Even acting upon the hunch that the
surname might have been shortened in Michko’s case, I still haven’t been able
to locate a reasonable possibility that might have been him.
As for John, thankfully his rock-like resolve to not
shed his identity allowed me to at least trace his side of my father’s family.
Every step of the way, I kept myself anchored in John’s routine appearance in
records, hoping—hoping—he would
someday cross paths again with his siblings and alert me to their whereabouts
as well.
I don’t know why this happens, but sometimes, chance events
can catch our attention and make us remember—and reconsider—tasks long since
set aside. I’m sure glad that was the dynamic that occurred when I spotted
Randy Seaver’s post on the latest New
York City record additions at FamilySearch.org. That
post tickled my memory, and I soon found myself playing the “what if” game
online with New York
City records again.
I didn’t even let myself get frustrated when the usual
disappointing lack of results hit me again while trying my hand at either my
grandmother’s or Michko’s data. They are simply not there to be found, much as
I discovered years ago when trawling through microfilms or even in the earliest
years of online genealogy at places like the Italian Genealogical Group (it’s not just for
NYC Italians, you know).
When it came to John, however—the one who was always there,
leaving me signs of his whereabouts every ten years—I encountered a
surprise so stellar, it nearly took my breath away.
That's encouraging. I need to check what's new in NY for my great-grandmother and her sisters. Thanks for the reminder.
ReplyDeleteOh, definitely, Wendy. I noticed several comments on Randy's blog from readers who had taken his hint and gone on to find several formerly elusive relatives. Maybe you'll find your mystery relatives as well. These are the ones you posted about, with the photographs, a while back, right? It would be nice to resolve that mystery!
DeleteWhat an ending, Jacqi - what nearly took your breath away? Roll on tomorrow ;-)
ReplyDeleteYes, Dara...tomorrow. And the next few days after that, as well. There's been a lot to work on :)
DeleteI wonder why they felt the need to hide their ethnic roots? My grandmother was the same way - except she just didn't talk about her Irish roots!
ReplyDeleteI'm not entirely sure why, Iggy. It seems many from that generation of immigrants were reticent to talk about their experiences. But this family went beyond just not talking about it. While I don't entirely know why--a story has been offered, but I hardly can trust it as being the real reason--they were not only very secretive about their past, but seemed to want to cover their tracks as well.
DeleteOne thing to note: During the years in question, 1871-1918 there was "no" Poland. German had absorbed the territory that was and would become Poland. Russia too, grabbed a chunk of real estate then.
ReplyDeleteYes, that's true, Iggy. And it's something to keep in mind as we trace this family's whereabouts, based on documents already available. Regardless of the politically correct term for any given year, though, this family was Polish. There is no doubt about that now.
DeleteSo if you found John's did you find Sophia 's too?? Hope so! :)
ReplyDeleteNo, unfortunately, I have not yet found anything further on Sophia. However, the documents I've just located for her brother most certainly reveal the pertinent details about her childhood, as well--thankfully!
Delete