Now that we’ve closed the current chapter on research about
the Melnitchenko family, it will soon be time to return to my original pursuit
for this year: research in preparation for a trip to find my husband’s roots in
Ireland.
Before we return to that study, consider the posts of the
next few days a seventh-inning stretch. Every now and then, I just need to take
a process break and talk about what is going on right now.
Lately, I’ve found myself more and more involved with our
local genealogical society. This is a good thing. It fits well with the
philosophy behind many of the projects I take on—like writing this blog, for
instance. It’s a philosophy of giving back—in return for all the help along the
way, on behalf of the many who would also appreciate knowing what I’ve learned
about family history.
For the past year, our society has taken on the project of
giving back to the community by providing free classes on how to begin
genealogical research. We conduct these classes in cooperation with our local
public library system. The library provides the classroom and the
administrative interface, the Friends of the Library funds the refreshments,
and our genealogical society provides the instruction—once a month throughout
the spring and fall semesters.
Last Saturday was our most recent training event. While our
sessions are equipped for about fifteen attendees (complete with laptops and
wifi access to the Library Edition of Ancestry.com), we haven’t always played
to a full house, but last week we did.
The positive response we received last Saturday went beyond
just seeing every seat in the house taken, though. It went beyond the subject
matter taught that day. What was particularly rewarding about this event was
what occurred afterwards. You see, our classes follow a general format like
this:
11:00 — Sign in and introductions11:15 — Begin instruction on specific topic12:00 — Q&A about the topic just taught12:15 — Break12:30 — One on one sessions with society volunteers
It is in this second hour that registrants for the class get
to break open their own notebooks, open their computers, and share with our
volunteers just what it is that has them stuck in their own research—or where
they’d like to begin their research
journey.
Our volunteers get all sorts of questions. We get attendees
who have no clue where to begin but remember some story grandma used to tell
them—was that true? And we get attendees who waltz in with three-inch-thick binders
filled with pristinely-organized,
studiously-completed charts, springing questions on us about their
tenth-great-grandparents and the finer aspects of research in the native
origins of their line.
There are two types of reactions that are notable, regarding
these situations.
The first is the response of inspired awe at seeing, for the
first time, a family member’s name—or even the actual signature—in a digital
copy of a document online. That’s the my-hands-are-shaking, I-can’t-believe-how-incredible-this-is
kind of response that has hooked us all and converted us into diehard
genealogists.
The second is the transcending response of sheer relief:
here, at last, is someone else who
appreciates what I’ve discovered, who walks the same solitary road I have,
loving the very pursuit that for others merely invokes that expression of my-eyes-glaze-over
boredom.
What is interesting about generating these responses in a
classroom setting is that they can achieve a critical mass if multiplied in
sufficient amount over a short period of time.
That is what happened in class last Saturday.
Who knows. Maybe it was just a great bunch of students last
week. Maybe it was the glorious advent of a spring sun bringing everyone’s
spirits back from a winter lethargy. It could
have been any reason causing the positive energy to flow.
On the other hand—and this is what I suspect is the more
likely reason—there is something very affirming about gathering together to
share one’s passion, even in a group as random as this assembly of strangers.
Letting the vehicle of genealogy classes help hone the self-selection process
results in the type of participants more likely to resonate with delight over
discoveries.
And like a chain reaction of the nuclear kind, each burst of
energy shared multiplies subsequent reactions, until the positive energy flow
infuses the entire group—and spills out the doors to reach out into the
community and invite others to come join in next time for more of the same.
In the case of positive energy flow in genealogical
workshops, critical mass can be achieved by a group small enough to fit into a
library classroom. It could be achieved by fifteen. It did last Saturday.
Or it could be achieved by a much smaller group. All it
really takes is two: to listen, to share, to connect through the mutual
fascination with what we are researching.
An energy level approaching that magnitude is, however, something near impossible to obtain, just sitting alone in front of a computer screen in your own home. When it comes to energy like that, it's something that just has to be shared with someone else.
An energy level approaching that magnitude is, however, something near impossible to obtain, just sitting alone in front of a computer screen in your own home. When it comes to energy like that, it's something that just has to be shared with someone else.
I know what you mean. Just yesterday I did a simple program about surnames for my aunt's church group's St. Patrick's Day luncheon. Many of the ladies came to me afterwards to share stories about their family history. I shared their excitement even though it wasn't my family or my discovery because I know how it feels to make a discovery.
ReplyDeleteThat's exactly it, Wendy! What a great story. I just love experiences like that.
DeleteThat reminds me of one member of our society. She often tells people the very reason she joined was so she could have someone to share her excitement with over a fresh genealogy discovery.
That energy is something you need to carry you past the brick walls and the frustrations. The social aspect is a bonus - like when one of Far Side's photos goes home - just knowing someone else "was involved" - makes some "dry, lonely" research rewarding.
ReplyDeleteNow you got me thinking, Iggy. Good point about the participatory process being there, even when we aren't sitting face to face with the people we're talking with. Sometimes, it's a tag-team conversation, and it happens "in the ether."
DeleteI had to go and blog about it...
Receptive people with like minds, that is always fun! What great personal satisfaction to be part of that activity:)
ReplyDeleteIt's the kind of satisfaction that draws other people in, too. Can't beat a bargain like that!
Delete