The charming little blonde girl dressed in her Christmas
coat and muff on the eve of 1955 was also facing another sweet moment. By the
time this family sent out their next Christmas card, young Diana had now
assumed the admirable role of big sister.
Or at least that’s how the photographer framed it.
Sitting on a baby blanket in front of a cozy fireplace
decked with the obligatory Christmas stockings, big sister Diana is reading a
story to baby Judy. Precocious Judy actually appears to be reading along.
Parents Sid and Helen are, once again, the invisible signatories to the card,
showing nowhere in the picture—though one suspects that either one of them
might be the event’s photographer. They do, however, send their holiday
greetings on behalf of those in the photo who are undoubtedly not yet able to
do so, themselves.
The card, once again, was sent to either William Samuel Bean
or his sister, Leona Bean Grant. While I drew it randomly from that big box of
unlabeled photographs passed along to me—as if I were a miracle worker or
something—I find it a good sign that this family’s holiday greetings were kept
from two years in a row. I’m hoping that makes it more likely that I’m looking
at family members—why, I don’t know…perhaps holiday hopefulness.
A logical conclusion to the matter would be to search
through the myriad other unmarked photos in that box and see if I can match any
other names or faces. That, of course, would be too logical for me, right now. For one thing, it is Christmas—I mean, it will be Christmas way before I’m ready
for it to be. And I have no time for such methodical tedium right now. I still
have packages to wrap. If anything gets a name affixed to it right now, it will
be the packages, not the pictures (though I have neglected to label packages
before, too).
Besides, I still have umpteen other genealogically-inspired
projects to complete—some, before the end of this year. Remember the First
Families of Ohio projects? Yep, them. Still need to get in the mail before that
December 31 postmark deadline. I may be celebrating my New Year’s Eve, starting
from the front step of my local post office.
Regardless, I do long to know more about all these
connections to family. Without a surname to help, though, it is tough slogging
right now. Do you know how many Sids there are out there who have married
Helens?! And with children born in the fifties, it is too soon to be able to
riffle through birth records. Diana and Judy—whoever they are—are quite
possibly still with us, and it is just as well that their privacy would be
respected.
However, if any one of these four were to stop by and leave
a comment—or send an e-mail—I’d most happily give them a belated Christmas
greeting by returning the sweet photo cards those parents mailed out
fifty-eight years ago.
Oh what fun -- the story continues!
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, Wendy, this represents the sum of what I know about this family. Just a snippet out of some mystery family's life...
DeleteMake some time so you won't be in front of the post office on New Year's Eve. :-) I've been blogging most of the day. Now I need to go go shopping.
ReplyDeleteGrant, I will no doubt be joining you in that last minute Christmas-shopping rush. But then, it's to the packet for the Ohio Genealogical Society!
DeleteLove it!!!!
ReplyDeleteChristmas does bring such family times to light, doesn't it?
DeleteI've looked high and low for these folks and came up empty.
ReplyDeleteI assumed your family (the Beans) knew them - so they were local to the Beans (or from where the Beans came from...) and found next to nothing to shine a light on them.
Perhaps someday they will appear in a database somewhere.. :)
Iggy, I'd done the same, too. Looked everywhere. Tried to manipulate the clues in all sorts of ways, but no luck. I just don't know enough about this family and all their distant relatives and descendants. Maybe after a few more months, I'll have enough data to tackle this mystery once more.
DeleteThanks for trying, though. If anyone could find out, I know it would be you!