Now that I’ve disabused myself of any notion that John Jackson married his bride, Sarah Howard Ijams, in the year of 1816, where did that date come from?
I accidentally stumbled upon some information that might
clear up that discrepancy. Wondering just what additional information I could
find on the family—despite not being able to glean enough on Sarah’s own
generation—I thought I’d jump back a step and look at her parents’ generation.
Now, I usually don’t like to make that move so soon. In most
cases, I find lots to keep me occupied within one generation, discovering all
there is to know on the siblings of one given family. It takes quite a while
before I get the sense of having found all I can find. It’s only then that I
will move back to the parents’ generation.
In this case, though, being stuck on this case of
Sarah-in-Ohio marrying John-in-Missouri, I figured there had to be more to this
story. Maybe the Sarahs of 2012 find no problem in saying “I do” to an eligible
bachelor living several states away. But this was 1816—or, more likely, 1818—and
frequent flier miles had not yet been invented.
I had hoped that just maybe I could uncover the story that
connected this Ohio outpost in Fairfield County with a fort in a place that wasn’t
even a state yet.
I went to one of my favorite sites for genealogy information
pre-dating the usual governmental records: Find A Grave. Now, you and I know
that Find A Grave doesn’t have everything there is to know about every
cemetery. But it is a good start.
Fortunately, it was the right start for me. Using the
Find A Grave search form, I started by searching for any results in Fairfield County, Ohio, with Sarah's father’s name:
William Ijams. With a surname like Ijams, I had an edge on chances of finding
something useful in the search results.
Photograph by Linda Huffman Powell |
Reading the Find A Grave entry provided a second hint:
William’s entry there was linked to that of his wife. The added bonus was that
her full name was listed. Not only did that confirm that her maiden name was
Howard, but it revealed that, after William’s death, she had remarried.
What is interesting to find about this second man that
Elizabeth Howard Ijams married is that he also served in the United States Army—and,
to be more precise, that he had served, among other places, at one particular
fort. Yes, you guessed it: John Whistler served at Fort
Bellefontaine, the very fort near Saint Louis that we have
been discussing in the case of John Jay Jackson’s travels.
Elizabeth Howard Ijams’ second husband, John Whistler, had a
full and interesting military career spanning over two decades. Upon orders,
after the War of 1812 was fully under way, to remove from his post at Newport
Barracks in Kentucky to Fort Wayne, he received word that his own
wife had died. That was in April of 1814.
By the time the war had drawn to a close, John Whistler was
stationed at Fort
Bellefontaine. He was
honorably discharged in 1815, but stayed on as military storekeeper at the fort.
It is quite possible that John and Elizabeth were married there, most likely by
1816. They remained at the fort for the rest of their lives—Elizabeth
dying in or near Saint Louis
in 1826, her husband following in 1829.
I still have questions about how and why Elizabeth
ended up connecting with John Whistler at Fort Bellefontaine.
More than that, I’m still curious to know why a recent widow in the Ohio frontier would be
venturing even further west on her own. There’s more to this story, which makes
me regret even more that there weren’t better documents from that era to help
me out with this question.
Those of us who yearn to do so much more in researching
family history than just serve as data collector sometimes find that we have to
be satisfied with what little we can uncover of these stories of the past.
Above left: photograph of the headstone of William Ijams at Stevenson Ruffner Cemetery near Rushville in Fairfield County, Ohio. Information on inscription gleaned from cemetery records, as the gravestone itself is partially sunk into the ground. Photograph courtesy of Find A Grave contributor, Linda Huffman Powell. Used by permission.
Above left: photograph of the headstone of William Ijams at Stevenson Ruffner Cemetery near Rushville in Fairfield County, Ohio. Information on inscription gleaned from cemetery records, as the gravestone itself is partially sunk into the ground. Photograph courtesy of Find A Grave contributor, Linda Huffman Powell. Used by permission.
Mail-order bride?? Is it possible they were cousins and this became a marriage of convenience?
ReplyDeleteNow there's a thought, Wendy ;)
DeleteWho knows what to expect here. I think that possibility of "the story" has got its hook in my mouth--for better or for worse, I'm bound to follow its lead.
Great research. Find a Grave is one of my favorite sites as well. I always in there.
ReplyDeleteGrant, that is one site that has always been so helpful. I keep meaning to "give back" and post some of my own cemetery photos there. Despite an active volunteer corps, Find A Grave still has plenty of gaps. Maybe when I get more organized, I can get some of those photos online there!
DeleteFunny, today my researh was looking into a Sarah Elizabeth Howard... hows that for odd....
ReplyDeleteThat is indeed an odd coincidence...maybe we are distant cousins and didn't know it???
DeleteMaybe John Whistler was a friend of Mrs. Ijams brother or brother-in-law ??
ReplyDeleteIjams is such an unusual name too. Is it a transliteration of Ingham ??
I'm not really sure of the origin of Ijams, Magda. Actually, I've only just discovered this surname in my husband's line recently
DeleteI've been cheating and reading ahead, of course, and saw some reports of English origin, but also discussion on the variants that have been found even there. I'll eventually post on it when I get to that point in my own research, but the "i-j" part of the spelling has often either been reversed, or substituted with a double "i" instead.
I saw one mention that this might be the sign of Flemish origin. No matter what it is, it comes from a point on the family's timeline in the early 1600s. I have so much to learn on this line!
I like the thoughtful and deliberate way in which you approached this research. And what a find! A second husband! And that explains the differences in distance, putting Sarah in Ohio. Back then, several states away was a huge distance! Your discovery must be very satisfying.
ReplyDeleteThe fact of the distance--at that time in history, too--is what gets me, Mariann. Yes, I am satisfied to see the one strand tying the Jackson family from Ohio with this outpost in the territory around Saint Louis...but I still think there is more to be found out about this story.
DeleteHighly unlikely that she traveled alone. She was with someone..brothers or cousins..or close friends..but not alone. Most people traveled with like minded groups of people..strength and comfort was found in groups:)
ReplyDeleteFrom some of the biographical notes I've read, it must have been a wild ride, even if it was in a group! I just wish the writer went into more detail than to just mention it was an "adventure."
Delete