Is there any wiggle room, pressed hard up against the
genealogical brick wall? That’s what I’m about to find out. Hopefully, this
inquiry will deliver me to the felicitous date when the National Library of
Ireland releases its digitized version of Irish Catholic Church records to the
virtual world, supplying me with a fresh supply of potential documentation to build my case about my husband's Irish ancestry.
I’m not so sure, though. The current promised release date
for the digitization project is July 8. And we haven’t yet escaped the
clutches of May. That would make for a pretty long wiggle.
When I last left researching my husband’s Irish family lines,
we had concluded a wonderful—yet exhausting—research trip to counties Cork,
Tipperary, and Kerry leading up to a week at the books in Dublin. Once home, I
had transcribed and muddled over my nearly-illegible notes, taken in utter
haste during that three week trip. (Three weeks may seem like a lot for time on
the road, but when it comes to searching for genealogical records, it never
seems to be enough time.)
That I was bumping into a brick wall of time-restricted
availability of records was not lost on me. Not only were we limited by our
time in Ireland—those precious few days in that three week period—but we were
also confined by the limitations of what was available on Catholic families living
in that former realm of the United Kingdom.
It did, indeed, feel as if I had gone “splat” on that brick
wall.
It is amazing how one phone call can resurrect hopes. And just
one week ago, that is exactly what happened. Now, I’m re-entering the sharing
stage with a distant cousin, eager to compare notes on our mutual family’s
history. All we have to go on, really, are a few hand-written notes stowed in
keepsake boxes passed down through the generations. We may have some of the
very few written remembrances of those family members. The wonder is that they
corroborate each other.
The person on the other end of the phone last week is the
sister of the third cousin who shared baptismal records for Johanna Tully Ryan.
Those, if you recall from this old post, aligned with the baptismal note we
subsequently found for my husband’s great-grandfather, John Tully. Of course,
there are more items to compare, which is what our upcoming project will likely
entail.
That is what launched me on a new course of inspection:
wondering just how my progress has been going on the autosomal DNA testing for
my husband’s family.
Yes (groan), more number crunching in our future. Consider
today’s post a baseline report.
When I subscribed to Ancestry.com, I decided that, rather
than recreate the same family tree I have resident on my desktop program, I
would separate out each of our parents’ surnames. Thus, I now have four
separate family trees on Ancestry, one representing the family tree of each of
our four parents. Comparing them to my husband’s DNA results will be somewhat
of a problem, as I don’t have any handy devices—like my half-brother’s DNA
results on my side—to separate out the maternal from the paternal. So, while I
can track my progress on each tree—Stevens or Flowers on my husband’s side—I can’t
separate the count through his DNA results.
With that caveat, here is where we stand at this
re-beginning. The Stevens tree, itself, now holds 768 individuals, mostly
within the last five generations—including, as I’ve discovered to be helpful when
examining autosomal DNA results, as many of the siblings of each generation as
possible plus their descendants.
In contrast, my husband’s maternal tree includes 967 people.
Perhaps that difference is owing to the fact that, though she assumed her
family had “just gotten off the boat” a few generations back, my mother-in-law’s
family came to the United
States before the beginning of the 1800s.
Often, the longer an immigrant was resident in this country, the easier it is
to press backward through the generations with viable documentation.
That, perhaps, is why, of my husband’s 462 autosomal DNA
test matches, the only two confirmed relationships belong to descendants on his
maternal side.
While it will be tempting, now that I’m re-opening the
possibilities of revisiting past progress on my husband’s lines, to go back and
add more names on that easy-sailing maternal side, I need to maintain my focus
on the Stevens side. While the going will be fraught with struggle—after all, I’m
no better off, right now, than a bug splat on my windshield after a drive on
the freeway—this is what needs to be pursued right now. Who knows
what a cooperative cousin may bring to this adventure.
Above: Print of Mitchelstown Castle, County Cork, Ireland, originally published in 1820 in "Views of the Seats of Noblemen and Gentlemen, in England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland." Courtesy Wikipedia; in the public domain.
Above: Print of Mitchelstown Castle, County Cork, Ireland, originally published in 1820 in "Views of the Seats of Noblemen and Gentlemen, in England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland." Courtesy Wikipedia; in the public domain.
You found a cousin! It is great to have company on your quest! :)
ReplyDeleteActually, this was a two-fer: a brother and sister who are not only interested in what I'm finding, but also have made their contribution toward the success of this Tully quest!
DeleteYehaw! Tully kin!
ReplyDelete:)
Oh, yeah! Time to celebrate! When this family first contacted me, I made a lot of headway on my Tully research, based on the information they gave me. I would never have known where to go in County Tipperary if it wasn't for the clues that first came from them.
DeleteYou never know what a chance connection may bring to the research table...