Showing posts with label Kleckner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kleckner. Show all posts

Friday, March 2, 2018

Stopped in Their Tracks


Sometimes, when a family's story unfolds, something comes up that is so big, so unusual, or so shocking that the observer just feels the need to stop and consider it. In the case of examining the roots of baby Faythe sweet infant featured with her mother in a hundred-year-old photograph I recently found in an antique storemy goal has been to find a way to return the picture postcard to a family member. To do this requires examining the various branches of the family, exploring marriages and children and home towns. It also, unfortunately, causes us to sometimes stumble upon news which is devastating enough, even to total strangers, to take our breath away.

We've experienced that before, here at A Family Tapestry. Rememberat least if you've been reading along here for a whilestumbling upon the horrible crash just before reaching home for a relative in the Irish family whose Christmas photo album I had found in northern California? Finding that news report was one of those moments.

And here we are again, looking over the shoulders of another family, watching their family history unfold as we try to figure out how to connect with them long enough to send them this little mementoand unexpectedly stumbling across the pain of a family tragedy.

Fay's uncle Clifton was a little over eight years older than she wasmore like an older cousin than any member of the previous generation. In a way, he could even have been like a big brother. Of course, I have no idea how closely the two of them kept in touch, though Fay may have indeed followed him out to the west coast from their home in Elko, Nevada.

But when you see the newspaper articles about what happened in December of 1940, it is hard to simply read through them passively without realizing the anguish the family must have felt.

Two days before Christmas that year, the San Francisco Chronicle headlined the terrible storms that had been sweeping the northwest, calling the source of the problem a hurricane. The front page on December 23 fretted about damage caused by eighty five mile an hour winds, coastal storm warnings, downed telephone lines, flooded highways and landslides.

In a brief companion piece alongside the lead story, a traffic report noted, "Three Killed in Bay Area Auto Crashes." One was Fay's aunt, Clifton Kleckner's wife Elyner.
Apparently confused by a heavy downpour of rain, Clifford A. Kleckner, 31, salesman, 160 Liberty street, last night drove his car around the safety gates at the San Bruno station crossing in the path of the southbound Southern Pacific Streamliner.

The article went on to explain that, by the time emergency personnel had arrived on the scene, Clifton's wife was already dead. He, unconscious with a fractured skull, was removed to a local hospital, where he was listed in critical condition. As we've already discovered, he died less than two days afterwards.

Perhaps I'm already sensitized to such tragedies owing to the experiences my husband and his siblings went through in their own familythe long saga I've shared here about Frank Stevens, his son Kelly, and his brother Gerry. I've learned from family members how hard it can be to endure the aftermath of such unexpected losses.

Whatever the reason, though, I just had to take a break from the search for the family of baby Fay to remember that sometimes, a family's story contains pain points. As family historianswhether for our own families, or in telling the story of others' familieswe need to respect that.  

Thursday, March 1, 2018

Back and Forth


While many researchers prefer to delve into their direct line of ancestry, it sometimes becomes helpful to keep an eye on what's been happening on those collateral linesthe families of the previous generation's siblings. That turns out to be the case in tracking the whereabouts of the Elko, Nevada, high school graduate we were once introduced to as baby Fay.

In 1939, Fayetta Mae Randall was attending school in Nevada. By 1940, however, she was a married woman in northern Californiamarried, incidentally, to a man born and raised in California, not Nevada. How did they meet?

Admittedly, we've already seen that baby Fay once lived in San Francisco, but we also saw that that was a short-lived residence during her toddler yearshardly the time of life for a budding romance. The rest of her childhood was spent in Elko. What was the nexus?

The man she married, Joseph Olindo Panuzzi, was the son of Italian immigrants Pasquale and Carolina Panuzzi, who, not surprisingly, operated a grocery store in the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County. Ever since their arrival in America, the family had been in the same northern California county.

It took some exploration through baby Fay's family tree to discover that there were other connections between her Nevada family and the Bay area. Back at the time of the 1920 censusthat same year in which Fayetta lived in San Francisco with her parents, Charles and Hallie Kleckner Randallbaby Fay's maternal grandmother had shown up in a census record in California, not in the expected Nevada where the woman's husband and other children resided. By 1920, Hallie's sister, Fay's aunt Birdie, had married, then divorced, then remarried her husband in nearby Alameda County, and apparently needed assistance with the household, including her infant twins.

In that year of family upheaval when Hallie's mom was across the Bay in Oakland with Birdie and her husband, Percy Calcote, Mrs. Kleckner had brought along her son Clifton, then only eleven. I'm sure, upon his mother's return home to Elko, Clifton went with her. However, by the time of the next census, he was back in California, a single working man residing in San Francisco.

If it weren't for one detail in the 1940 census, we wouldn't have known that, in the midst of those years in which Clifton showed up as a resident in San Francisco, he actually spent some time back home in Elko. Fortunately, that one census question"In what place did this person live on April 1, 1935?"revealed that he was back in Elko.

He wasn't the only one in his household who was back in Elko in 1935. By 1940, Clifton was married, and his wife had also stated that she had been living in Elko in 1935. Could it have been upon the couple's return to California that Fayetta traveled with them? 

Though Fayetta's young uncle, the newlywed Clifton, was back in San Francisco, that was not for long. By the end of the year, and at the age of only thirty one, Clifton was dead, succumbing on Christmas Eve, only two days after his wife's death, from injuries sustained when their car was struck by a Southern Pacific streamliner.

Clifton's older sister, the twice-married Birdie, had once again divorced her husband, returned to Elko, married another man and subsequently moved to Washington, so she was no longer a connection to California. The rest of the Kleckner siblings had remained in Elko. Not until decades later would Fayetta's mother return to California. But for the mystery nexus between Clifton's niece Fayetta and the son of an Italian immigrant in Contra Costa county, Fayetta would probably have been back in Elko, as well.