When all the usual places—digital repositories for documents
such as census records or birth, marriage or death records—fail the dogged
genealogical researcher, the next best place, in my opinion, is to head to the
newspapers.
Let's just say, in trying to secure the connection between my grandmother
Sophie’s brother Michael Laskowski and his American remake as Michael Lasko, I haven’t had the best of outcomes. While Michael said he had filed for his naturalization papers, I sure haven’t
been able to find them—not under Laskowski, nor under Lasko. And I can’t, yet,
be sure the Michael Lasko appearing in the New York City census records along with wife
Mary and sons Albert and Wilbur is actually the Lasko who used to be a
Laskowski.
The problem: I see no smoking gun. I have no evidence to
connect the two. So I go looking through the newspapers. Surely, there is some
mention of this Michael Lasko that connects him to Sophie Laskowski.
We have already romped our way through The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, thanks to the portal at the New York Public Library. In addition to finding the engagement and wedding announcement
for Michael’s son Wilbur, I did happen to find a small insertion on the third
page of the edition for April 14, 1909, that was of interest:
Michael Lasko, 26 years, 133 North Eighth st., and Mary Hecker, 24 years, 361 Humboldt st.
Here was their own entry, under the imposing title, “Marriage
Licenses, Issued in Brooklyn for Twenty-four
Hours Ended at Noon To-day.” It was plausible that this could be our Michael Lasko—if, that is, you could
believe the report from the passenger records at Castle Garden in which he was
declared to be four years of age in 1889 and
don’t mind mixing it with the considerable fudge factor of a couple years age
difference.
Now, on to the scramble: did I have any record of our Michael’s place of residence? While
there was no sign of Michael anywhere
in the 1910 census, over at the Brooklyn home
of his parents, Anton and Mary Laskowski, what should I discover in the
enumerator’s notes but that very same address: 133 North Eighth Street.
I’d say that would qualify as this researcher’s smoking gun.
Above: Excerpt from the 1910 United States Census for Brooklyn, Kings County, New York, showing Anton and Mary Laskowski as the third household at 133 North Eighth Street. Image courtesy Ancestry.com.
Above: Excerpt from the 1910 United States Census for Brooklyn, Kings County, New York, showing Anton and Mary Laskowski as the third household at 133 North Eighth Street. Image courtesy Ancestry.com.
Why are they listed as Pukalski's. My goodness. I am glad you found them but where was Michael?
ReplyDeleteSince Michael had already married, I'm presuming he had, by then, moved out of his parents' home (the Laskowskis). Of course, that doesn't explain where he was--just where he wasn't.
DeleteAs for the Pukalskis--actually, that was a poorly-executed write-over that should have read "Puhalski"--that's a matter for another day's post.
It's no wonder this has been a challenge for you! Goodness... you really had to pay close attention to the "fine print"!
ReplyDeleteIt's in the small print that we sometimes find our biggest breakthroughs. And I'm thankful to have the tools to find it now. Can you imagine how impossible it would have been to put that all together without computerized search capabilities?
Delete