Finding Franciszka Olejniczak in the midst of records in multiple languages may prove to be a challenge. There are some things to keep in mind when researching a Polish ancestor like this second great-grandmother of mine. Here's a little "score card" to help, providing some things to keep in mind as we proceed. We've got to go easy on ourselves when researching in this location during the time period which includes her lifespan, from the early 1800s to the beginning of the next century.
For one thing, Poland wasn't a political designation at that point. Though Franciszka and her parents Mikołaj Olejniczak and Josepha Grzegorczyk may have always thought of themselves as Polish by ethnicity, they were residents of a country then known as Prussia. Even reading a brief overview of the historical consequences of Prussian and German rule over what is now the western portion of modern-day Poland, I can begin to understand the possible underpinnings of why my father's immigrant family brought with them a sense of avoiding all identification with a Polish heritage.
Such historical details may lie hidden behind our genealogical rush to find the bare basics of documentation evidence, but they cannot be ignored. Yet, even in the rudimentary search for paper evidence of their existence, it is easy to see the language predicament they—and, by proxy, we as researchers—faced in their daily life.
For one thing, those of my Polish ancestors who adhered to the faith system of their own forebears were mostly Catholic. Thus, from the very first writing of their name in baptism, these ancestors were recorded in the language of the Church: Latin. However, that is not necessarily a guarantee that the priest recording the records was himself a native speaker of the Polish language. A Catholic priest from, say, Italy or France might hear a Polish surname and write it as he heard it, including the phonics of his own native language, all somehow bundled up with the requirement of a Latin record.
A name like Olejniczak might suffer all sorts of permutations with that treatment. Take the letter "j" for instance, and think of how differently it was pronounced by the various languages on the European continent—not to mention the history of the evolution of the letter itself. For some, "j" and "i" were interchangeable. Thus, to search for old records under a surname like Olejniczak requires an understanding of that history.
That would be the hazards of navigating Latin records. Then, too, there were civil records, which were kept in German, with its old script which is hardly read in our current times, taking an effort to decipher, using another set of skills.
Underlying all that was the fact that, in a Polish resident's own language, there were different phonics and customs for naming. Regarding phonics, a name which in a Latin baptismal record in 1836 might be rendered as Francisca might in Polish be written as Franciszka—and pronounced with a "sh" sound for the "sz" in the Polish spelling of her name. Likewise, her father, given as Nicolaus in her baptismal record, would actually be written as Mikołaj in Polish, complete with diacritical marks which could be transcribed by English-speaking volunteers in our day as a "t" instead of an "ł."
Wild cards rule the day for searches through digitized record collections.
That, however, is not all, when it comes to going easy on search terms. We also need to take into considering cultural naming traditions. In the case of the Polish culture, their language expects agreement between what might be called "masculine" versus "feminine" word endings. This extends to surnames. So, for instance, any daughter whose father's Polish surname ended in the quintessential "-ski" would have her own surname completed with the revised "-ska." In Franciszka's case, her surname did not end in a vowel, so that would not usually apply to such cases, but it is something to keep in mind when researching many other Polish surnames.
All of this blends together to tell me one thing: when searching for an ancestor whose family originated in the area now known as Poland, don't take that search process literally. Use wildcard characters, depending on the usage rules of the website being consulted, or enter segments of the name, like "Francis" instead of "Franciszek" or "Franciszka." And if the website allows percentages of similarity in a search box, slide that bar down from a high and mighty ninety nine percent to a more forgiving number.
Just as I did in October for the other members of my father's Polish family, next I'll jump into the Polish websites to see what can be found on Franciszka's family. Hopefully, there will be additional names showing up in both church and civil records to tell us more about this extended Olejniczak family.
No comments:
Post a Comment