Saturday, April 6, 2019

Now Indexing:
Something to Match my Goals


While flitting about social media the other day, I happened to spot a tweet by genetic genealogist Shannon Christmas recommending that FamilySearch indexers volunteer to help the Restore the Ancestors 2019 Project.

Of course, then I had to ask, "So, what's the Restore the Ancestors 2019 Project?"

I'm sure you're asking that, too.

As it turns out, the project is a handy partner project to what I'm trying to do with my own King Stockton project: restore hidden clues about family to help descendants of former enslaved persons penetrate that family history brick wall and reach back prior to the Civil War for records of their ancestors.

Sponsored, along with FamilySearch and Black ProGenLive, by the Center for Family History at the International African American Museum, this online effort is calling for all volunteers willing to help by doing the data entry necessary to make already-digitized records searchable. The records selected for indexing are those which will be of most help to researchers pursuing their African-American roots. In many cases, they are documents obtained from southern counties in which few antebellum records still exist.

The project's website explains, in simple terms, how an interested volunteer can sign up to help, and what the project's first record set targets are. Since I'm already an indexing volunteer at FamilySearch, I requested to join the Restore the Ancestors 2019 project right away, and waited for the administrative go-ahead. Within hours, I was admitted to the group, and started my first indexing batch.

The first project selection is the marriage record set of Colleton County, South Carolina. While there are couples married there from all ethnicities—and thus, all records are indexed for this project, regardless of ethnic origin—the project managers feel that this set, completed, will greatly assist those researching their African-American roots in that region.

The records were easy to read—although the sets I did had images needing to be rotated ninety degrees—and I breezed through two sets with hardly a problem at all, despite the usual challenges of reading handwritten documents. Since the amount of time required to do just one set is minimal, it's a task which can easily be sandwiched in during breaks in the day.

Of course, with the 110 members—and counting—who are also working on this project, I suspect this record set will be dispatched to the "done" box in no time at all. There are doubtless others the project managers have already selected for completion. And what a sense of accomplishment to see those numbers on the graph chart the group's progress!

As King Stockton's ancestors likely did not come from South Carolina, it's not like this project will answer my direct research needs. Then, again, I don't really know; after all, Colleton County is not that far away from the Georgia coast location of the Tison plantation where King Stockton's mother Hester was once enslaved. Whether participation in this project leads to a personal research breakthrough or not, it's a good feeling to know that these crowdsourced efforts to make more records searchable will someday spill over into a region or record set that might provide an answer that I am searching for.  

10 comments:

  1. I saw a post about it on Facebook and thought of you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, the news was bound to catch up with me one way or another, Wendy. Whoever is behind this project has plenty of publicity in their favor. I've seen several announcements in different places. Good for them. Hopefully, it will get a lot of the indexing work done quickly!

      Delete
  2. I really appreciate all that you and other volunteers do to index these records for us. It is a tremendous service.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Miss Merry. And what is wonderful about it is that it really isn't much work at all--especially if many people pitch in and take on a small part. That's the beauty of crowdsourcing a project.

      Delete
  3. Way to go! I have been at Family Search this month trying to do my part!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Far Side! This is a great way to "give back" for all the benefit we've gotten from these great online resources--make even more available that will help someone else!

      Delete
  4. I am so interested to hear about this. I hope all of the counties in South Carolina will be covered. Please keep writing here about the progress of the whole project.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll do what I can, Lisa, but you will likely see others mentioning this project, too. It's created quite a bit of buzz in the genealogy community.

      From what I understand, any records in the south will be considered for the project. The batches I did the other day included marriage records for people of all ethnic backgrounds, but focused on one county. I'm sure other counties in South Carolina will also be covered, but so will counties in other states, as well.

      Delete
  5. Do the records you did have any information on them that is not typical???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not that I recall, Suzie Q. Of course, the one thing that stood out was the question about race, but that was not so uncommon. One other thing I noticed was that there was more information in the documents than what the indexers were asking to be entered in the data fields, but again, that seems to be usual in the indexing process--why I always recommend viewing the document, no matter what info was included in the transcription.

      Delete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...