Shortly after Mary Chevis Davis Chitwood was abruptly widowed, she found herself saying “I do” to a man from neighboring Carter County, Tennessee. What, exactly, his
name was, I can’t say. But I do have quite a paper trail of
possibilities.
My starting point for all Davis family research was the family Bible,
once kept by my great-grandmother, Martha Cassandra Boothe Davis. She, in turn,
had passed it to my grandfather, Jack Davis. That was when I had first copied the
data from its register in the center of the thick book. Upon my grandparents’
passing, the book became the possession of my aunt. Upon losing her last
November, the Bible found its way to me.
Cassie Davis must not have been a careful record-keeper, as
I’ve since found in comparing her notes to official governmental documents. Her
notes on her daughter Chevis’ second marriage were particularly unhelpful. At
one point, she entered her new son-in-law’s surname as “Kite,” but on another
page, wrote it as “Kyte.” To complicate matters, at one point, she simply
listed his first name as Jack, though he also went by initials F. L.
Trying to ascertain the truth of the man’s name by wandering
out into the world of digitized records bore that scenario out—no, actually
added more confusion to it. The 1920 census showed him as Luther F. Kite—other
than that pesky detail of a middle initial, the same spelling as shown on the Unicoi County
marriage bond, which he signed with that precise spelling, on December 17, 1916.
Yet, the 1930 census presented an entirely different picture. Perhaps it was because the census canvasser for that decade was a stickler for details—after all, they were supposed to list first names first. Chevis showed up in that document, predictably, as Mary C. One can only hope to infer from her husband’s entry as Franklin L. that he, too, preferred to be called by his middle name.
By the time of the 1940 census—a change which I’ll delve
into tomorrow—suddenly, both Luther and Chevis had their surname spelling
changed to Kyte, perhaps bearing out that alternate spelling version that
surfaced in the Davis family Bible.
It might seem to you that I’m being overly demanding in my
aggravation over these details. After all, in genealogical research we’ve all encountered
entire centuries of records that dealt fast and loose with ye olde spelling. So
am I fussy about all this in records of the early 1900s? I don’t think so, of
course.
There are a few reasons for this. First, finding some
other records showing his name to be not Franklin but Flavious, upon encountering any
new documentation, I couldn’t be entirely sure I had located information on the
right Mr. Kite. Or, um, Kyte. Then, too, just as I had encountered with this
name problem when researching Chevis’ first husband—having the popular surname Chitwood—there
were a lot of people with that same
last name, at least in the state of Tennessee. How was I to be sure I had the
right Flavious/Franklin/Luther Kite/Kyte?
Even at the point of discovering what I thought was his
obituary, years later, upon receiving a copy of the newspaper article, I had doubts this
was the right man.
Sometimes, you just have to do the best you can in research,
up to a point, then close the books on the pursuit with the caveat that you
need to revisit the quest at a later time, when more information becomes
available to you.
That was what I had to do with my research, years ago, in
Chevis’ case—until the 1940 census became available and I discovered some
changes that may confirm that I had found the right obituary, after all.
It's not like Flavious is a variation of Franklin. I'd be skeptical too.
ReplyDeleteI would, too, except...it's just that, somewhere in my pre-citation years, I made a note of a record of Flavious. Maddening.
DeleteI am reminded of some of Far Side's photos - the ones where the name is difficult to make out - and how that makes investigating "who they were" so much more difficult. Here you have a case of a person with a "blurry name" (as opposed to a clear cut name and a blurry person!) If anyone can get to the bottom of things with Franklin/Flavious Luther whatsits... it is you!
ReplyDeleteNow, that's a great way to put it, Iggy. That's pretty much how it is: blurry!
DeleteYes you are hot on his trail...I can tell:)
ReplyDeleteWell...here's hoping ;)
Delete