Thursday, June 6, 2013

Are These The Same Two Sisters?


Reminding me vaguely of the two little ones on the 1954 and 1955 Christmas greetings signed, “Helen, Sid, Diana and Judy,” a set of photographs from Bill Bean’s collection has me stumped as to whether I’m lumping the wrong blonde sisters together. Is this one set of sisters? Or two?

If you don’t remember those Christmas cards I posted last December, click on the hyperlinks and refresh your memory. These were the photos with the little girl in winter coat and muff—and then the next year, now-big sister and new baby.

Let’s see if we have found some further matches.

The first candidate for this matching game is a Polaroid snapshot of two little blondies playing with a brown and white spaniel. Of course, this picture produces two clues to link it to Bill Bean—first, his tendency to prefer his Polaroid camera, followed by the telltale hallmark of the same dog seen in many of Bill’s pictures from that time period.

possibly Diana and Judy daughters of Sid and Helen

A later picture—now entering the world of color snapshots—also features two blonde sisters, this time older and more sedate as they pose in their matching dresses. Again, there is a dog in this photograph, but this brown and white companion looks more like a basset hound than Bill’s spaniel. I’d like to presume the man holding the dog is the two girls’ father—and possibly the same man as the one sitting in the background of the previous picture. But I’m not convinced.

California family possibly sisters Diana and Judy daughters of Sid and Helen circa 1960s

Even after scanning the two photographs and enlarging them to study the details, I’m not sure these two sets of sisters are one and the same. Yes, their mother(s) tended to prefer the high trimmed bangs in fixing their hair, but that might just be the style of the time. Or the way mothers thought their daughters ought to look.

Along with these candid shots in Bill Bean’s photo collection, two studio portraits were included. Once again, they appear to be of sisters—carefully trimmed bangs, matching outfits and all.

possibly Diana daughter of Sid and Helen from California circa early 1960s
Judy or Judith from California early 1960s

Whether these all belong to the family who once sent Bill and Ellen Bean yearly Christmas greetings—signed, from Sid, Helen, Diana and Judy—I may never know. Of course, if someone had thought to include a surname, I’d have one up on the genealogy website search engines.

Perhaps I’ll have to wait until some computer guru masters even more amazing search capabilities.

Or maybe I’ll have to resign myself to awaiting the release of the 1960 census.

That would be a long wait.

16 comments:

  1. Same sisters, for sure. I'd put money on it. And let me know how you like the 1960 census -- that's the first one I appear in. Darn, I wish they'd speed up the release!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not in that much of a rush for its release, Wendy. There will be other ways to find these things out. Just think of it as yet another way to "build character" (as I'm sure many of our mothers and grandmothers might have said).

      Delete
  2. They look like the same girls. My mother always had my bangs cut the same and I hated it. I think at the time it was popular because of Mamie Eisenhower.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aw, Claudia, now you've made me go back and take a look for pictures of Mamie Eisenhower. I never gave it much thought before. I'd hate it too, if I had to have bangs like that!

      Delete
  3. The studio portraits look a lot like the second picture and with any luck having such clear studio photos will help you identify these orphan photos. I also see the resemblance you Wendy and Claudia see in all the photos including the christmas card. I'm just not quite ready to put my money on it though it wouldn't be a bad bet!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Smadar, you may just be right about that. I just found another photograph...

      I'm away at the Southern California Genealogical Society's "Jamboree" conference right now, but when I get home, I'm going to scan the photo and see what everyone thinks.

      The added bonus? This one has names listed on the reverse!

      Delete
  4. The same girls..Diana and Judy! For sure! Too bad you don't know their last name. Someplace there is a face recognition software..I have heard about it but know nothing about it..it might help in this case. Maybe Iggy knows about it:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Far Side, I would love it if I could harness some reliable face recognition software. You are right: Iggy would know. He sent me some suggestions last year, but as I recall, they didn't quite do the type of search I'd need. But someday, there will be something that does the trick.

      Delete
  5. With Bill having studio portraits of the girls - one must think the family connection - whatever it was - was very close, at least really good friends.

    I looked up Cavanaugh (of Bean and Canvanaugh) and that man's name was Lee. Shucks.

    If we could ID these girls - the stories they could tell you!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Iggy, that brings up a good point: maybe these are business associates, rather than relatives. That certainly broadens the field of possibilities, though...something I wouldn't be prepared to tackle...

      Delete
  6. I found a "hummmm..." Did you know that Dr. Sidney Garfield of Kaiser Permanente (the owner of the Oakland Hospital) married a much younger woman named Helen around 1952? If they had children... I can't find anything to that regard ... but ... Dr. Garfield it seems, was a heart specialist..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please join in as I start humming the theme to "The Twilight Zone."

      Delete
    2. Okay, that is an interesting find...

      Delete
  7. http://www.stuff.tv/news/life-etc/stuff/the-history-of-the-polaroid-instant-camera tells us that the Polaroid instant photo reached the market place in 1948. Any Polaroid shot will date after that year. Apparently the "film" size changed and it might (just might) help date the shots to when that particular film size was produced. Can you measure the photos? :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can't wait to get back home now and measure those photographs. As I remember, they were about the size of an index card, but I'll measure them for sure. Having a range of dates will help.

      Delete
  8. Oh, I think this is the same pair of girls, three times over. Call it a gut feeling. I was posed so many times as a little girl that I totally recognize the similar style in the second and third pair. And the man with the spaniel/hound even has his hair parted on the same side. I'm calling it a match. It's an ID until proven to be an error -- our version of "innocent until proven guilty."

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...