Here’s to untraceable faces from Christmas cards of the
past.
Who is Mabel Gosline? You’d think that identification on the
back of this Christmas greeting would present straightforward marching orders
for an online search. Armed with Ancestry.com, FamilySearch.org,
NewspaperArchive.com and others, I thought it would be child’s play to knock
out all those toy soldier false leads in the twinkle of an eye.
But no, there are no false leads—well, other than several
California Voters’ Registration listings for a Mrs. Mabel Gosline.
I don’t think this Christmas card is from a married Mabel
Gosline. With the card dated 1952, showing a young woman of a marriageable age,
I don’t think this Christmas greeting would be sent with a picture like this
if it were representing a married woman. Back in 1952, a married woman would have proudly posed with
her husband at her side.
Finding an unmarried Mabel Gosline presents an entirely
different search, one at which I’ve not yet been successful.
This card comes from my collection inherited from the Bean
family. Remember last year, about this time, when I started the series on that extended family? I would have loved to include this card in that series, but
one thing held me back: I couldn’t figure out who Mabel Gosline was. Friend?
Family? Direct descendant of a common ancestor? Third cousin fifteen times
removed?
There is no way—at least up to this point, a year later—for me
to tell.
So, now that the year has rolled around to that same point
in time, Mabel is getting her fifteen minutes of fame. Why? She is reminding me
of all those faces which, while not nameless, still present the diligent family
history researcher with an unsolvable quandary.
If I’ve got them in my stack of mysteries, I know you do,
too. So, in this season that calls us back to family and remembrances, don’t be
shy about pulling out those photographs that still stump you. Maybe your
visiting aunts and grandparents can provide the missing puzzle piece that
connects your mystery picture with memories of times long gone.
See is quite slender - I am unaccustomed to trying to guess women's ages (especially from older times) as it is - but I would say it's possible she is as old as 45.
ReplyDeleteI wonder, given her fitness, if she was a skater for the ice show the poodles were in.
That's a good guess, Iggy. Since I hadn't had any luck with pre-1950 documents, I thought I'd try old newspapers, but the site I use seemed to be suffering from computer glitches at the time. I'll be trying that route soon, in hopes she was mentioned in some other local activities. Maybe even some ice show fame :)
DeleteSeems like a unnatural/strange pose, I wonder what the horse? on the mantle signifies? I thin she is in her 20's or early 30's..but that is just a guess:)
ReplyDeleteWell, I'm sure it seemed like a good idea at the time ;)
DeleteGood eye on the horse, Far Side. Hopefully, it might be a hint...or just a decorating preference. I was thinking she was in her 20s or 30s, too, but I also thought Gosline was her maiden name, yet no sign of any younger Mabel in the 1940 or even 1930 census. She really has me stumped.