Although I’ve worked on it for over a year now—posting
daily, piece by piece—I still have several items left to post from the collection of
Agnes Tully Stevens’ personal papers I received last year. Everything from
nearly-meaningless scraps of paper to tenderly-kept letters from a son far away
at war has been preserved in this collection. Some of these items I’ve been
able to identify, or at least discover some back story. But some, frankly, I’ve
put at the bottom of the pile until—hopefully—I could extract some meaningful
explanation.
That time has come to face the music and post the
remainders, story or no story.
Today, I’ll begin this series of miscellaneous postings with
a form letter. Sad, short, but nevertheless, a form letter.
It is one of those unfortunate requirements of life: the
pre-printed thank-you note for use by the family bereaved of a loved one.
The message is sparse. On the cover, simply the phrase, “In
Appreciation.” Inside, the sentiment states:
The Relatives of the late
Mrs. Mary Tully
acknowledges with grateful appreciation
your kind expression of sympathy
This begs the question: which
Mary Tully? Along with an over-abundance of Tully women named Margaret, this
family also had its fair share of women with some form of the name Mary.
My guess at this point—given that the card came with no
envelope or any indication of a date—is that this Mary Tully would be Agnes’ aunt,
the woman married to Patrick Tully, brother of Agnes’ father, John. If this is
the case, Mary’s maiden name would be Hogan, and, depending on which document
you are viewing at the time, she was reportedly born in either Ireland or Canada.
As to the location in Canada,
it would be the village
of Paris in Brant County, Ontario, where she does show in the 1861 census, serendipitously on the same
page as the Tully family. This, also, is the likely spot for her marriage to
Patrick, although I have yet to discover anything documenting that event.
Mary Hogan Tully, having been the mother of seven children, saw
the passing of three of them before the 1900 census—and all but two of them
before her own death—including her son, Bert, who like his younger brother
succumbed to tuberculosis in Chicago seven months prior to Mary’s own passing.
Perhaps it was because of these many losses that the widow journeyed from her
home in Chicago to live with her daughter Margaret, now
the Mrs. Michael E. Dempsey, in Hamilton, Ohio, thirty miles to the northwest of Cincinnati.
At her passing on August 22, 1914, Mary Hogan Tully made
that same journey in reverse, being buried in the family plot at Mount Olivet
cemetery in Chicago.
A Butler
County newspaper, the
Hamilton Daily Republican-News, recorded her passing in the manner in which those
of that past century would be familiar:
Mrs. Mary Tully died at the home of her daughter, Mrs. M. E. Dempsey, of 816 Dayton street at 11:15 o'clock p.m. Saturday of a complication of affections aged 70 years. She was a communicant of St. Mary's church, was a devout Catholic and her death has brought pain and sorrow in many relatives and friends. The remains will be conveyed tonight to Chicago where the funeral will take place Tuesday from St. Patrick's church with interment in the Mt. Olivet cemetery, Chicago.
Alas for those of us interested in tracing her genealogical
records, such an obituary neglects mention of which other child still survives her. Or perhaps the inferences I’ve been
left to glean from other documents has not served me as well as I’d hoped.
Perhaps I’ve lost count. Perhaps she was now only survived by one.
It's a pleasant irony that the card that seemed to tell no story has inspired such a rich and full one.
ReplyDeleteThankfully, Wendy! Those names with their stories missing are so tantalizing!
DeleteI cant wait to read on here one day in the future where that journey lead to...
ReplyDeleteWill the real Mary Tully, please stand up? Don't we wish it was that easy?
Oh, believe me, I would love to know more about this Mary. Actually, you've inspired me to insert a bit more about what I know of this Mary in another post. I do have some more documentation...I may as well share it!
DeleteThis is definitely a case of too many Mary's.
ReplyDeleteI find this curious:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/MS7M-SQF
..just looking at Chicago, I see about 5 Mary's...
I know it, Iggy. I'm sure there were more than even five. At least I have that limiting factor of looking for someone related to Patrick and John Tully's generation. Except for that missing other brother, it keeps the list somewhat restricted.
Delete