Tuesday, April 9, 2019
The Problem with "Mr. and Mrs."
Finding an antique photograph with a name is always an enticing moment for me. I wonder: with just the name—and perhaps the location of the photographer who created the portrait—can I find a way to return this abandoned item to descendants of the family?
In many cases, since I've taken on this challenge a few years ago, I've been able to do so. See, those genealogical research skills come in handy.
And so it was, last summer when a friend and I drove up to the foothills of northern California—think Gold Rush country—and found a stash of such specimens at an antique store in Sonora. My only mistake, at least with one candidate I found to purchase, was relying on the name of the husband without any regard to how helpful a wife's name might have been in the process.
You know that old-fashioned etiquette: a woman wouldn't dare let herself be seen outdoors without cover of that title, Mrs., along with (at the very least) two initials representing her husband's given names. To be called by one's own name? Scandalous, at least for a proper married woman.
And so, I picked up the photograph of a young Mr. and Mrs. Albert Roberts, never dreaming that the Council Bluffs, Iowa, portrait could represent one of three different Albert Roberts couples living in the vicinity of that midwestern city.
Granted, I made a valiant attempt at isolating the right Mr. and Mrs. Albert Roberts. I scoured newspaper entries. And more entries. I hounded local historical societies for dates of the photography business. I borrowed likenesses from Find A Grave volunteers. And, of course, I stalked other Roberts researchers at Ancestry.com.
One such researcher was gracious enough to answer my unusual request. I wasn't sure that my photo's Mr. and Mrs. Albert Roberts were one and the same as those in his family tree, but what I did know was that if he had any photos of his Mr. and Mrs. Albert Roberts, it might help me determine whether to rule out one of the three possible couples in the Council Bluffs area.
At first, this respondent doubted that anyone in the family even had a photo of this ancestor couple of theirs. But then, as Life has a habit of doing, circumstances changed. In the wake of an unfortunate loss in his wife's family, she had been sifting through old family photographs in preparation for the funeral, and came upon a photograph she never thought she had. You guessed it: it was a picture of the Albert Roberts family.
Though the photo was taken of a somewhat older couple—by then, with three children—the clothes seemed to indicate they were from about the same time period. The names of the children match up with one of the Albert Roberts families I had researched, as well.
Oh, for access to one of those computer programs that creates a graphics sequence of "aging" a face of a younger person. All we have to go on, here, is our imaginations, but see what you think. Here, with permission of their second great-granddaughter and her husband, is a photograph of Albert and Alice Roberts and their daughters Lillian, Mayme, and Ola.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Oh, I think it's definitely the same couple! Can't wait for the rest of the story.
ReplyDeleteJackie, thanks so much for weighing in on this. I can't wait for the rest of the story, either! This thing is unfolding as we go. Remember, I'm the genealogy guinea pig. We're all in this journey of discovery together.
DeleteI can't even look at the parents with those adorable faces of the children. What cutie pies and how lucky the family was to find this photo.
ReplyDeleteYes! Aren't they just personality plus?!
DeleteI can see Mrs. Roberts clearly - must be the curly hair. MR Roberts is a challenge. If only OLD Mr. R would turn his head for me or if YOUNG Mr. R would look straight ahead. The light colored hair and receding hairline could certainly have become the look in the older photo. I can detect a little bit of the younger mouth that resembles the older mouth. I vote YES.
ReplyDeleteThat's exactly what's got me, too, Wendy: if only! It makes deciding all the more difficult.
DeleteMore than likely...he really aged:)
ReplyDeleteThat's the difficulty in a receding hairline: it does make a man look so much older. On the other hand, if this really is our couple, this Mrs. Albert Roberts was several years older than her husband, but this woman doesn't look like she's aged quite as quickly.
DeleteI think that everyone in the family looks well nourished, but Albert looks like he has been quite ill, perhaps. He has a gaunt look about him. I wonder if he had an illness or an accident. His foot is at a funny angle, but it could be just the way he is sitting. So enjoy reading your untangling of these puzzles.
ReplyDeleteThanks so much for your comment and observations. Isn't it interesting that we are learning to be so hyper-sensitized to every little detail in this quest? I had spotted that angle, too, and it made me wonder. That is an interesting point about Albert looking like he had been ill, though.
Delete