I am not much of a list-maker. For me, drawing up a “to do” list
borders on the anathema. I’ve always had a self-organizing type of mind, I
guess.
Until lately. Looking at this unyielding set of Flannery
family members, I am struggling to convince them to give up their secrets. They
have finally driven me to drawing up lists.
Let’s look at the first list of family members we have
available to us: the 1852 Canadian Census for the village of Paris
in Brant County, Canada West. We have
Ed-blot, age 45Mrs., age 35Patrick, age 19Cornelious, age 17Michael, age 15John, age 4
Where Ed-blot and his family ended up for the subsequent
census in 1861, I’m not sure—mainly because I couldn’t really be sure of the
actual name of this household’s head. I’m not sure the census enumerator for
the small town of Paris, Ontario, was sure, either. For his duties in
1861, the enumerator listed the head of household for the only Flannery family
in town as Edward.
Could Edward be our Flannery man? Let’s see who was in this household in 1861:
Edward, age 55Marg’t, age 52Mat, age 19Ellen, age 18
That, incidentally, comprised the household under the
spelling, “Flanery.” Oddly enough, since the “Flanery” household was at the bottom of that census page, John, age 12, was added, not at the top of the
subsequent page, but the page afterward—not matching up with any contiguous
entries whatsoever.
The 1871 census for Edward and Margaret include precisely
those two, only: Edward at age 62, his wife at age 60. None of their children
remained in the household. By the next year, Edward himself had left—passed away
on June 30, 1872. I could not locate Margaret in the next census—I had hoped
that would reveal where some of her children had moved—so have to presume that
she had died, also.
The only other Flannery household I could find in Paris was that of Ed and
Margaret’s son, Patrick. Gone were Cornelius and Michael without a trace.
Though I still couldn’t find baby brother John, I did discover one hint of his
availability in a transcribed mention as the reporting party for his brother
Patrick’s death record in 1895.
Trying to cross-check that with the burials at the local
Catholic cemetery was fruitless. My only accessible record is that offered by a volunteer’s entries at Interment.net—for the most part, as we’ll explore
tomorrow, representing the descendants of son Patrick’s family.
Sometimes, the only option when faced with Internet-only
researching options is to set the whole project aside. Newly-placed digitized
records are coming online at such a rapid pace that chances are excellent that
what can’t be found today will be staring us in our faces in the
not-too-distant future.
Meanwhile, just because I have it, and just because I can, tomorrow
I’ll share what I’ve found on son Patrick’s family, the only ones—apparently—left
in Paris in the next generation.
I think using Ed-blot is "catchy" - Imagine having a relative named that (for real)? :)
ReplyDeleteGlad you find it catchy, Iggy. I was brainstorming with my daughter over this Flannery roadblock a while back, and it just sorta came out. It will always be Ed-blot for us, from now on :)
DeleteI make lists all the time...keeps me on track:)
ReplyDeleteWell, I sure will need one this time!
Delete