It was toward the end of Richard Kelly’s life when he
relinquished his position as head of household and took his place, next door,
in the home of his son-in-law. He had lost his wife, Louise, the year before the 1940 census revealed this change.
Though he was aging, the move wasn’t due to declining
abilities. After all, he still was employed by the Fort Wayne Police
Department, despite his reported age of sixty eight. It most likely was a mute
testimony to the loneliness following the loss of a lifelong spouse.
The move, though, helps us see some of the life details of
the next generation in this Kelly family. The census showed a household composed
of three additional people. George Horton, the forty two year old head of
household, being a Hoosier State native, had apparently taken as his bride
Richard Kelly’s only daughter, Helen, who by now was thirty four, herself.
Completing the family was thirteen year old daughter Joan.
The singular feature about this household unit was that the
youngest member of that family happened to be the only descendant of the entire
Kelly line proceeding from Richard’s father Timothy to take her place in that generation. As was her mother, she was
an only child—and as her mother was Timothy’s only grandchild, Joan became his
only great-grandchild.
There was more than initially meets the eye in this 1940
document, however.
Supplied instantly with the married name of Richard’s
daughter, thanks to the shared household documented in the 1940 census, I turned
next to FamilySearch.org to seek the Hortons’ marriage record. With much more
detail than I’d ever found in earlier marriage license applications for Kelly
family members, this scanned image provided a wealth of information, including
such non-essential but nice-to-have details as George’s middle name (Robert).
It also pointed out one other key detail: the couple
exchanged their wedding vows on April 21, 1937. With a thirteen year old
daughter in their 1940 household having a birth year pre-dating that event, it
brought up a question: whose daughter was Joan?
Apparently, George and Helen were each previously married.
Though the 1940 census indicated that Joan’s surname was Horton, it could have
meant either that she was George’s daughter and Helen’s step-daughter or that Joan was Helen’s daughter and George
subsequently chose to adopt her. (Of course, it could also have signaled us
that this was a careless census worker.)
Perhaps Richard Kelly did not have a granddaughter, after all.
It turns out the Horton wedding was not the only marriage
record tucked away in the FamilySearch.org files. Thanks to cross-referencing
with her parents’ names, it was easy to access Helen’s first marriage record,
too.
Eleven years prior to the Hortons’ wedding, Helen had been
the bride of one Herbert E. York. On May 29, 1926, the twenty four year old
roofer set up housekeeping with his bride, and by the 1930 census, the couple were
the proud parents of a daughter: Joan.
What occurred between that event and the couple’s divorce
soon after—it occurred in 1931—is impossible to tell. There is no one to ask;
if it weren’t for public documents, I wouldn’t even have known of these people’s
existence, much less their domestic difficulties. Though Joan’s father didn’t die until 1952, I haven’t been able to find any burial information for him in Fort Wayne. With the gaps
in historic newspaper collections hitting the very dates I’m seeking, it will
be a long wait until I can obtain his obituary.
Joan’s mother, however, apparently remained with George
Horton until his passing on September 17, 1972, in Wolcottville, Indiana.
She, dying in 1987, took her place alongside him at the Catholic Cemetery back in Fort Wayne.
Try as I might to find any further sign of their only
daughter, Joan, I did not succeed. Whether assuming her surname as Horton was
correct, or just a figment of a census-taker’s imagination, no matter how I manipulated
the variables, I couldn’t flush out any sign of what became her future.
Hopefully, that is a good sign—a sign that she married and eventually
gifted her grandparents and great-grandparents with at least one, if not more,
descendants.
There must be an obit from 1972 that lists relatives.
ReplyDeleteWe are just in the baby steps of starting an obit recovery program from the two Funeral Homes in town. We save all the newspaper obits from two newspapers and file them by year but only started that in 1990. Someday it will usable info:)
That sounds like a much-needed project!
DeleteOver the years, our local genealogical society has dedicated itself to recovering significant records of interest to researchers, compiling them into publications. Bit by bit, over those years, those are the types of projects that help make a difference.
It takes lots of perseverance, but the end result is so worth it. Best wishes on your obit recovery program!