When I was a kid—you know, those early years when I knew I
was “born wanting to do genealogy”—I asked my dad where he came from. Like,
where his parents were born. And their parents.
His answer—as I’ve often mentioned—was “Aaah, you don’t
wanna know that.”
My mother, always ready to fill in the blanks, recited the
party line for me, possibly in hopes of placating me and making this genealogy
stuff all go away: my dad’s father was Irish and his mother was German.
End of story.
Of course, I didn’t stop trying. But I wised up to other
ways to find these things. I learned about research. Paper trails. Census
records. Newspapers.
Alas, all these things were only accessible to those willing to travel to the appropriate source, and in many cases,
considering my age and stage in life, this was not possible.
And so, the story languished. Until.
Until changes happened in the family. For one thing, I left
home and moved across the continent to attend college. People grew up. Attitudes
changed. Possibilities opened up.
And people died.
One of my cousins—actually, a cousin once removed—was tasked
with the inevitable “Family Tree” homework assignment at school. About that
time, I had headed south to L.A.
on some business and ended up visited my brother. We got to talking about that
mysterious family tree—he being quite a bit older than I, and me thinking
perhaps he would remember stuff from the relatives he knew from his childhood.
He mentioned the upshot of our cousin’s homework assignment.
“We might be Polish,” he said with marked incredulity. Being Irish was a big
thing for my brother.
It was in that conversation that I first heard the surname
Laskowski. Before that, I had had no idea. My brother floated a few more
possibilities—some that yielded results, some that turned out to be bum leads.
A bit later—perhaps, mindful of our conversation about
family roots—my brother flew back east to attend a gala event thrown in honor
of my aunt’s seventieth birthday. He managed to bring a tape recorder with him,
and sweet-talked my aunt into letting him interview her as the guest of honor.
She obliged.
During the interview, he deftly led her back down memory
lane—mostly about special times in her own life. But then, he slipped in some
prompts about remembering other family members. My aunt talked about her
favorite cousin—the same Francis Laskowski whose wedding was eclipsed by my
aunt’s own—and some of the times they shared together. When her memory seemed
to falter, my brother would gently prompt her for descriptions and names. Nicknames.
Married names. Details about relatives, drawn out oh so gently.
Tenderly, he walked her back down that memory lane until she
was talking about the previous generation. And then, unexpectedly, my aunt
mentioned that her father had a sister.
The tendency to grab at details of this kind can be
overwhelming when you know absolutely nothing about a family’s background. But
an over-eager reaction can breach the mood—and in an instant, the interview can
be aborted.
My brother tried to coax more information from his
reminiscing subject. She was able to remember that this woman was married more
than once. Thankfully, she remembered one of the married names, but the other
one slipped her mind. It was simply not there to recall.
It was such a gift to receive a copy of that taped interview—not
only because of all the treasures of family history it contained, but because
within the decade, my aunt, herself, passed away, taking all those memories
with her. Even though I was subsequently able to return back east to visit with
her once, before her passing, I could tell her memory was fading. In
conversation, she would confuse people’s identity. By then, it would have been
unlikely that her recollections would be reliable.
Shortly after this time was when most of our family entered
the computer age. Instead of letters, phone calls, or those infrequent
transcontinental visits, we could connect by email or chat. I started to
compare notes with some of those cousins-once-removed (the virtue of being the
child of someone so removed in age from me is that my contemporaries in family
circles were all the children of my
cousins—handily equipping me to have no difficulties whatsoever grasping those
once-removed labels that cause so many such confusion).
Two of these cousins were daughters of a woman who had died
early, as a result of cancer. They had been going through their mother’s—my
cousin’s—papers after her passing. They noticed some unusual documents, which
brought an odd episode to mind. Once, her daughter had caught her with some
music of the Polish national anthem or other patriotic music from Poland. It had
been hidden away in the piano bench—never taken out when others were present. When
questioned, the woman wanted to change the subject and even began shaking. Why?
What was there to cover up?
My cousins now think that this was one way their mother was
attempting to connect with her roots. Somehow forbidden to do so as a child,
she couldn’t deny the pull of that basic question: who am I and where did I
come from?
Other stories came out—about my father and his sister being
strictly told never to reveal their roots. This would result in awkward
scenarios for this younger generation. My aunt could never, for instance,
invite her high school friends home with her, after school, for fear they would
realize her mother had to speak to her grandmother in a foreign language.
The story that got told to family was that the switch of
names was to allow their father to get a job. There was much prejudice against
the Poles at the time, but favor was turning toward the Irish—so the story
went. How a Polish immigrant was able to pass himself off as an Irish-American,
I’ll never know. I would think the accent would get in the way of such a ruse.
At that time, I had not yet discovered the paternal surname,
Puhalski. But even when I did learn of that possibility, it did not permit me
to gain any traction in furthering my research.
Oh, you can be sure I tried—I poked, I prodded, I massaged
the data gleaned from governmental documents, but without any success at
discovering the identity of this paternal grandfather.
But…he had a sister? Perhaps this was my key to bypass this
genealogical enigma. I could start a new research trail: finding out about Aunt
Rose.
How sad to have to hide in plain sight. Now Jacqi, if you were the subject of "Who Do You Think You Are," some credentialed genealogist would tell you to go to Poland. When are you planning your trip?
ReplyDeleteIf there was ever a place where one could "hide in plain sight," it would be New York!
DeleteAs for Poland, Wendy, well...it's not in my foreseeable future. Of course, if a soon-to-graduate college senior ever ends up doing another semester abroad--and if she ended up choosing Poland as her destination--then I suppose I could find a way to get there!
Aunt Rose! I hope the search has some answers:)
ReplyDeleteBelieve me, Far Side, I do too! She may be my one hope to figure this whole mystery out about who my grandfather actually was!
DeleteBaffling ... it must have been quite a surprise to learn about an unknown sister! This part of your family tree seems like a 100,000 piece jigsaw puzzle!
ReplyDeleteThat's an apt way to put it, Iggy! It certainly feels that way!
DeleteSuch enjoyable reading!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Margie! That's encouraging to hear!
Delete