So, you missed the latest sale for DNA testing? Don’t
despair. Here are a few thoughts to review—and, if you’re keen on being
prepared, to get done before the next sale descends upon us.
One thing you probably have realized, if you’ve followed
along here at A Family Tapestry for
any amount of time, is that I haven’t
missed that DNA sale. In fact, I had a specific reason for catching this last
round of sales: I now have a mystery cousin, adopted, who was delivered to my
digital doorstep by this very method (the mother’s line mtDNA test), and with
whom we hope to discover a closer connection via autosomal DNA testing.
Now that I’m mulling over the nearly seven hundred matches I’ve received from this
most recent test, I’m discovering a few pointers. Not that I’m a keen observer
of the obvious or anything. It’s just that reconciling the multiple surnames of
seven hundred other genealogy enthusiasts with my own database of fourteen
thousand individuals can do that to a person.
In less than a month of data sifting, here’s what I’ve
decided.
It’s the work that
comes afterwards that makes the test
worth the price.
As I’ve mentioned before, I’m the type who feels the need to
study a thing to death. Then I take Step One. Don’t do this. When it comes to doing the DNA test, jump in, feet first.
You will learn as you go. The worst thing you can do is take the test, get the
results, and then just sit on them. (Actually, I’d say that’s worse than not
taking the test at all.)
I started off, in this DNA testing world, using the Y-DNA
test for both my brother and my husband. For each one, I was hoping to discover
what had been eluding me about their respective paternal lines. While the
results are intriguing, they didn’t bring me any closer to my genealogical
goals. I found using the autosomal test to be better aligned with my
genealogical goals, and I’d strongly recommend you start at that point as well,
if you are seeking a method to confirm your family history research.
That said, let me warn you: there is work involved in
receiving DNA test results. The “results” are not the answer. They are only the
key. If you want to know anything
more than the vague “Where My People Come From” readout that gets included with DNA
test results, you will need to have your family charts in hand, and your email
fired up and ready to roll. You’ll find yourself sifting through endless lists
of other people’s genealogy, looking
for that needle in the haystack of humanity that makes you and your “match”
relatives. You may be asked to confirm proposed results with the company from
whom you purchased your DNA test. That will entail reaching out and comparing
notes with other researchers. You will also need to be prepared to give to
others what you are asking them to reveal to you: as complete an ancestral
chart, GEDCOM or surname listing as you can provide, to help others determine
whether they have a match with you.
Bottom line: if you are not willing or able to pay the “price”
of the work, it certainly will not be worth the cost of any DNA test—even at
the sale price.
If you don’t do the
work yourself, no one else is likely to do it for you.
Genealogists must all be very nice people. At least they are
polite—demurely waiting on the sidelines, just hoping some dashing leader will
come along and sweep them off their feet with an invitation to do the Relative
Rumba. Don’t wait. Take the lead and make the contacts with your prospective
matches. Be the one who reaches out.
Of course, there are those lucky participants who have a
Fairy Godmother, ready to wave a wand and get all that grunt work done for
them. Those Fairy Godmothers are called professional genealogists. Sometimes,
it is they—or, at the least, a “proxy” or results administrator—who will
oversee the exchanges with prospective matches. If you don’t have one of those,
you are the one who will need to
attend to all the details of making connections with your matches.
Be prepared to make a lot of email contacts with people you
never heard of before. Those people are your prospective cousins. Yeah, they
may turn out to be seventh cousins, twice removed, but hey—they’re the family
you paid those big bucks to find, right? Some of those connections may help you
break through intractable research brick walls. But you’ll never know until you
take the initiative and connect with those strangers on your match list.
Take those
relationship ranges with a supersized grain of salt.
Family Tree DNA likes to offer its customers a suggested
range of relationships. “Suggested” is my euphemism for their disclaimer, “your
actual relationship is highly likely to fall within these…limits.”
What I actually discovered is that some of those ranges are
more hopeful than pragmatic. I don’t know; perhaps it is the result of coming
from a small family, none of which has jumped on the DNA testing bandwagon
unbidden. Besides my own brother, whom I cajoled into doing the Y-DNA test
because he is our father’s sole surviving male descendant, I show no first or
second cousins in my test results. Mostly, that “second to fourth cousin”
category leans heavy on the fourth cousin.
Fifth or sixth cousins? Oh, yeah. I’ve got plenty of those.
But do you realize what finding connections with a fifth cousin—or sixth
cousin, or beyond—entails? Think about it. I have. Like, seven hundred times I’ve
thought about it.
Realize the impact of
those numbers you’re seeking.
Entering the DNA testing arena with the starry-eyed notion
of finding one’s roots makes great advertising copy. But when it comes right down
to it, relationships are translated into numbers. Like, “sixth cousin.”
Have you ever given any thought to what it takes,
research-wise, to come up with documentation to secure that rank of sixth
cousin? If you don’t have a genealogy database complete to seven generations of
your ancestry, you will not be equipped to determine if anyone is your sixth cousin.
Worse than that, if you don’t have the slots filled in on all those fifth-great-grandparents, how
will you be equipped to determine whether your “match” really matches you? In
case you’re wondering, that would be the names, dates and places of the vital
statistics for sixty four individuals
you could potentially have in common with your match (assuming your match is either from your paternal side or your maternal side), just at the
level of fifth-great-grandparents. If you’re not quite prepared to rattle off
those details just now, that’s what
you need to focus on while you’re awaiting the next DNA test sale.
Connections come in
all shapes and sizes.
Sure, filling in those sixty four slots will give you a
listing of all your fifth great grandparents which could potentially be held in
common with your match. But only after you added all thirty two of your fourth
great grandparents. And your sixteen third great grandparents. You do,
incidentally, already have the complete picture for your second and first great
grandparents, too, don’t you? That’s another twelve people.
And that’s only presuming you and your match come from that one side of the family. What if the
connection is from the other side?
Make all those numbers times two: you will get DNA matches for both the
paternal and maternal sides of your
family.
Getting that completed will give you a nice ancestral chart
to work with, once you start pondering those multiplied DNA matches. But that
won’t be all you’ll need.
Doing this DNA dance has made me grateful that, a long time
ago, I decided I would not only research my direct line of ancestors, but
include the data on all their siblings, up each generation—and as many of their descendants as I could find. Not
only does that sound unwieldy—believe me, it is—but I sure took the heat for
that plan several times over during the decades I’ve been doing this.
Now, though, it is paying off. Collateral, as Amy Johnson Crow likes to call it. The details on all the siblings of your multiplied great-grandparents.
The kind of relationships that yields you, ultimately, your sixth cousins. You
know: the ones you’re trying to match up with, now.
Believe me, in this quiet week between Christmas and New
Year’s Day when I wanted to huddle in a quiet corner and get all my ducks in a
row for the upcoming year’s research, what I’ve actually done was spend some
time each day, ferreting out possible matches—not only for my own DNA test
results, but as administrator for both my husband’s and my brother’s matches.
When I’ve taken the time to scour a match’s surname readout—or, better yet, his
or her family’s GEDCOM—I find I have better results when I match someone whose
family line is an old, well-established line settled in this country since the
1700s or earlier. Why? It’s those Broyles and Taliaferro lines that are so well
documented that I can snag their descendants’ surnames as well. Yeah, that’s why I have upwards of fourteen
thousand individuals in my database. But it doesn’t bog me down now. It’s handy
to be able to put my finger on a match’s surnames and know they are part of
these long-standing lines.
I’ve said all that to make one point: if you are thinking
about doing your DNA testing, while you are waiting for the next big sale, do
yourself a favor and work on these things. Push your ancestral chart back as
many generations as possible. Fill in the blanks for all the missing “greats”
in your lines. Consider adding information on all the siblings of your direct
ancestors, including married names for the women. And see if you can bring
those siblings’ lines forward a generation or two.
Your DNA matches will come in all shapes and sizes. They
will come hidden in surname labels you don’t recognize. They will come with
incomplete documentation that doesn’t quite reach back as many generations as
you need to make that distant connection—and sometimes you will have to fill in
the blanks for others as well as for your own data.
The more you get your own paperwork in order, the more help
you can be to your fellow DNA seekers. And, once you make the big decision to
spring for it, the more value you will get out of the DNA testing process.
Oh you make me feel guilty...I should do that research. Some has been done for me already. I have so many irons in the fire already...if only I were two or three people!
ReplyDeleteYou have quite a project before you!! :)
No guilty feelings, Far Side...you will find a way to do what needs to be done. Like your slow and steady posts on your one blog about family memories, bit by bit, these things get done.
DeleteI'm one of those just sitting on the results, sorry to say. I've contacted people on my dad's DNA results but the mtDNA results are just so OUT THERE that I haven't bothered. Maybe I need to reconsider them but so far they seem so remote that I can't make myself believe we're related.
ReplyDeleteWendy, that is exactly what happened to me when I first started out. My first attempt was the Y-DNA test for my husband's Stevens line. I didn't feel as if I had found anything meaningful in the results. At first, I thought it was just me--but then I stopped beating myself up when I realized how long a span of history this test can reveal.
DeleteSame for my own mtDNA test--even on the cousin with whom we have an "exact match," the timeline may exceed 750 years. Who has that kind of genealogical paper trail?!
Even though the results may lead you to relatives as distant as sixth cousin or beyond, I find the autosomal DNA test to be the most useful. It reveals more "recent" history--at least recent enough to register on our family tree paper trails.
If you are game to give it another try, I'd heartily recommend you take a look at the autosomal test--the one called "Family Finder" at Family Tree DNA, for instance--or the same type of test at whichever company you prefer.
The results I am discovering from this test are much more meaningful and usable, as far as our own genealogy research results go. As long as I keep plugging away at the data, I'm verifying matches on a regular basis. Keep in mind, I'm plowing my way through nearly 700 matches, so this will take time to do all the comparisons, but at least when I look at the results, I can feel, "This is do-able!"
I've not seriously considered the idea. My mom's family tree, with its many years in the USA might prove most interesting.
ReplyDeleteThere are people all across the board on this one, Iggy. Some think it's helpful, some don't see the value. It probably has to do with a mix of your research goals, combined with the results you'd get back, if you tested.
DeleteIf you do decide to experiment with DNA testing, I'd recommend going the route of the autosomal testing, first, mainly for the points I mentioned above, following Wendy's comment.
Your observation about your mom's multi-generational history in the United States is a good point. I seem to find more matches on those lines I have more thoroughly researched, and all of those happen to be from families with long-standing residencies in this country.