No matter how much we want to contort the facts to force
them to submit to our preconceived notions of how things were, back when, in
our family, we simply can’t.
Not if we want to arrive at the truth.
Of course, it doesn’t help that we are still squirming under
that strange mention of a now-dead “nephew” of John Kelly Stevens—Raphael Kruse—when
no connections to a Kruse family seem to materialize in documentation.
All we have, so far, is a mention of a Mrs. Henry Kruse in
Eliza’s own obituary—if,
incidentally, that is the obituary for the right
Mrs. Stevens.
Now what?
If you were thinking that Eliza Murdock Stevens’ husband
predeceased her, you are thinking on the right track.
If, however, you assume that his obituary will provide any more information on the names of
those three daughters, you assume incorrectly.
Are you kidding? That would be too easy.
Not to mention, this obituary starts moving us backwards in time to
that era in which people—especially women—are rarely named in public reports.
In including John Stevens’ own obituary below, I’d like to
say, “Here, let this suffice you.” But I know it will do no such thing.
In fact, it will insert a few messy puzzles of its own.
Here’s how the Lafayette
Daily Courier published John Stevens’ own obituary on Saturday, July 15,
1893. It showed in the Indiana newspaper on page 1, column 4:
This morning at one o'clock occurred the death of John Stevens, aged 80 years, at his home, No. 22 Green street. The disease which caused his death was jaundice, superinduced by extreme old age. He had been sick a good while, and the hot weather had acted seriously against him. Mr. Stevens had lived in Lafayette nearly fifty years, and was married some forty years ago to Eliza Murdock, eldest sister of James and Thomas Murdock. Five children were born to them, four of whom, with the widow, survive. Mr. Stevens was a well known citizen, a highly respectable man, and possessed of a great many loyal friends. The funeral will occur Monday morning from St. Ann's church at 9 o'clock, interment in St. Mary's cemetery.
Five children, you say? Well, there were John’s three sons
by his previous marriage to Catherine Kelly: James, John Kelly and William. We’re
pretty certain of that—although William’s strange disappearance from records
for great stretches of time does cause some alarm. And then there were the
three daughters John and Eliza had in common. Admittedly, one of them—Elizabeth—died before her
father did, in 1892. But even with Elizabeth
already gone, that still doesn’t explain the newspaper’s count.
Of course, as has happened many times since, we can chalk
that up to newspaper error.
Or perhaps there is more to the story.
Sherlock Holmes would have enjoyed this "case of the mystery relative". :)
ReplyDeletePeople died and remarried so swiftly back then, I think about 1/2 the people in the country had 1/2 siblings!
Good observation, Iggy. Half-siblings and step-siblings were probably a lot more common than we suppose, emerging from those "good ol' days."
DeleteA real mystery:)
ReplyDeleteWell...you know there is always an explanation ;)
DeleteI have a picture of a Victorian memorial for Henry and Eliza Kruse..could this be the couple in your post?
ReplyDeleteThank you for stopping by to mention that possibility. However, in this case, the couple was Henry and Nellie--whose mother was Eliza. Plus, Nellie's given name was actually Helen.
DeleteThe couple lived in Lafayette, Indiana, and were married in 1879.
It seemed so close, but I guess this doesn't sound like a match. However, I appreciate your willingness to share!