While it is true that my qualification to become a member of
the Daughters of the American Revolution lies with the history of one man named
Zachariah Taliaferro, I had stopped just one generation shy of my proper
target. Yes, Zachariah Taliaferro—the one born in Virginia about 1759—was himself son
of Zachariah Taliaferro. That
Zachariah—the father, born in Virginia
about 1730—was indeed the man I’ve been searching for.
Thanks to my Genealogy Angel, I already know the D.A.R.
Ancestor Number of the right Zachariah Taliaferro. Thanks to the D.A.R. Genealogical Research System—open
online for anyone wishing to explore it—the ancestor search index to their extensive set of
patriot names (as well as descendants having already stated their genealogical
claims) served to set me straight on just who I needed to honor with my application.
In defense of my hasty assumption, young Zachariah was of an
age to have served, himself—barely. I’ve read many a history of the time including
vignettes in which boys attempted to join themselves to the fighting ranks. But
for sake of expediency, it will suffice to stick with the established
records and proceed with my application linked to the proper Patriot. The
senior Zachariah it will be.
May it also be noted (as I am rather miffed at myself for
such a hasty conclusion, and in need of self-justification here) that there are
innumerable Taliaferros of an age to be part of the action, winding their way
through the Virginia
territory. One may find, online, quite a few details on their genealogy—of which
I, predictably, take much interest.
The younger Zachariah, it turns out, was the second son of
the elder Zachariah. Thankfully, I’ve long since drilled into my mind a tactic
to keep the identity of the namesake separate from that of his father: remembering
the name of each one’s wife. Father Zachariah claimed as his bride Mary Braxton
Boutwell. Son Zachariah was eventually wed to the former Margaret Chew Carter, related
somewhat closely (her paternal grandfather’s first cousin) to the Virginia land baron known
as “King” Carter—but that’s a bunny trail for another day.
And yet, somehow I missed that generational step. Not good
for a discipline so detail oriented. Which makes me quite grateful for that
D.A.R. index. It’s always handy to have an authoritative resource for double
checking that work.
Above right: Watercolor, circa 1910-1920, by Charles M. Lefferts depicting various Continental Army uniforms; from the Anne S. K. Brown Collection at Brown University, courtesy Wikipedia; in the public domain.
Above right: Watercolor, circa 1910-1920, by Charles M. Lefferts depicting various Continental Army uniforms; from the Anne S. K. Brown Collection at Brown University, courtesy Wikipedia; in the public domain.
Glad you figured that one out, Jacqi! Our ancestors probably had no idea of the confusion they were causing their genealogist descendants when they named their children after themselves. Congratulations on completing your research for the DAR.
ReplyDeleteLisa, that certainly makes me more mindful of what I'll be leaving behind for my descendants! :)
DeleteYou will prevail! :)
ReplyDeleteThanks for the encouragement. Right now, I need a cheering section! Paperwork is not my forte.
DeleteKing Carter -- I've heard of him and this isn't even my line. Hurry Hurry -- get to this bunny trail!
ReplyDeleteWendy, I did actually already yield to temptation on this one. A few years ago, my sister was in Virginia and happened upon a museum or restored residence or some holding having to do with Robert "King" Carter. She was fascinated (she's a banker). Right after that, I happened to be mentioning Margaret Chew Carter, our family's direct ancestor, and she popped up with the predictable question, "Say, are we related to King Carter???"
DeleteNot closely enough, it turns out, to matter much. But it does make for an interesting conversation piece whenever we run into anyone knowing enough about history to make the connection.
And I will, I promise, at some point get to that bunny trail. :)