If the census enumerators of a decade long gone had any idea
how many contortions they’ve since instigated among
genealogical researchers, thanks to impossible handwriting and well-meant
but poorly executed line strikes, I wonder how different our pursuit of
ancestors might have been. That musing, however, might encroach upon the realm
of doubtful debate, so I’ll let it be. I will, however, take this brief
opportunity, by way of explanation, to register my complaint.
One helpful way to pursue difficult ancestors is to follow
the trail of their close relatives. Often, a clue may be gleaned from the
notes, letters, or newspaper reports (think: obituaries) of family
members.
Having discovered the possibility that Johanna Tully Ryan
had not only moved from her native Ireland to Canada West—and then further,
with her husband Edward and children, to the Dakota Territory in the American
West—I certainly needed some additional clues to confirm what I was finding.
After all, tracking a name like Edward Ryan might be difficult, considering how
common the name was.
That’s why it was helpful to have a solid record of the
family constellation from the Canadian censuses of 1861, 1871 and 1881—all in
the same general vicinity of the province
of Ontario. I now knew I
was looking for Edward, husband of Johanna and father of James, Dennis,
Margaret and Mary—not just for a solitary Edward Ryan, born in Ireland.
Of course, it was reassuring to locate Edward and Johanna in
the 1900 U.S. Census in North Dakota.
After all, hints from one of the Ryans’ direct descendants had helped lead me
to that American territory. But owing to the loss of the American 1890 census,
the gap between the Ryans’ last known address in Canada and their new home in the
West meant I was now seeking a household that might only contain an aging
Edward and Johanna.
Thankfully, a Dakota Territory census, completed just before
North Dakota
achieved statehood, provided some clues that the adult Ryan children had traveled
with their parents to their new home in this Newest World. I first found these via the North Dakota State University archives, accessible online. Since the archives then provided Ancestry.com with
the microfilms to make digitized copies, I was able to pull up the actual files
through my subscription there.
Although son Dennis’ entry was indexed at NDSU as “Discus,” there he
was in Walsh County, with his wife Mary and young daughter,
along with his parents Edward and Johanna. His older brother James, though
harder to find, was likely there in a nearby county.
The puzzle comes with the whereabouts of the two daughters,
Margaret and Mary. By the time of this 1885 territorial census, each of them would have
been in their twenties—the potential time of invisibility, thanks to the
tradition of name-changing upon marriage. Compounding this challenge was
another one: by the time of the 1900 census, their mother declared that she was
the mother of four children, with only two still living. Eldest son James—he of the direct descendant who has been helping me with documentation from his family's own records—was still alive, married, and with a growing family of his own. I already had discovered
that Edward and Johanna’s son Dennis had died—in 1892—so which of the two
daughters was lost?
As we’ll soon see, thanks to handwriting errors in
various documents, that has not been an easy task to decipher.
That missing 1890 US Census makes for a lot of trouble.
ReplyDeleteIf they had digitalized the record for that census in 1891 - we'd still have a copy! :)
If only...
Delete