One of those areas designed to drive a genealogist to
distraction is the realm of pet names. Nicknames have likely been around as
long as have the names they were crafted to replace. Consider the longest name
in one record of antiquity, the Bible: Mahershalalhashbaz. What do you suppose
his buddies called him?
Granted, most nicknames are derived from more manageable
proper names. But even then, there is wiggle room. Most people, for instance,
can readily tell you the nickname for the inconveniently three-syllable-long
woman’s name Margaret would be Maggie.
Or is it Marge? What about Meg? Or Peggy?
See? There are multiple possibilities.
When it comes to the reverse process—determining an unknown
given name, based on the nickname we do know—there likewise is such a
challenge.
Consider Mayme, the possible nickname of the wife of my grandmother’s
brother, Michael Lasko. In searching for listings of traditional
substitutionary names, I found a number of resources. All confirmed what
readers here had mentioned in the comments yesterday: Mayme is likely a
nickname for the given name, Mary. But it could also be a nickname for
Margaret, according to the FamilySearch.org wiki, “Traditional Nicknames in Old
Documents.” (If you’re curious, here’s their Nickname to Formal Name chart
here. And, for those wishing to reverse the process, the US GenWeb Project
page, Common Nicknames, also comes in handy.)
Let’s go ahead and test out that hypothesis. What can be
found for a Michael and Mary Lasko in either Brooklyn or Queens in New York City?
I had actually started on this pursuit years ago, when I
hadn’t yet found enough material to substantiate the possibility. I had poked
around on the Italian Genealogical Group website (remember, it's not just for Italians) to find any New York City grooms by the
name, Michael Lasko.
There was one: a man whose Brooklyn
marriage in April, 1909, was to a bride named Mary Hecker. The only other
possibility in that database during that time frame was for a Max Lasko who
married in 1917. There were no results for a Michael Laskowski.
Granted, the database was limited. Besides the time frames,
there was also the parameter of city boroughs—some had records available for a
greater time span than others. For instance, I still can’t find my own
grandmother’s marriage record—neither at this website nor in the old-fashioned
way, cranking through microfilms. I suspect the city wasn’t too efficient at
keeping records of such activities back then.
What if our Miczislaus Laskowski was really this Michael Lasko? Did he marry Mary
Hecker on April 14, 1909? What else can we find on this couple?
As has already been mentioned—thanks to a link provided by
Intense Guy—there was a Michael and Mary Lasko, living in Brooklyn
at the time of the 1920 census. Likewise—although indexed under the spelling “Laska”—for
the 1930 census. And again, back to the usual spelling, for the 1940 census.
This same Michael Lasko, on the same Bleecker Street in
Brooklyn where he resided at the time of the 1920 census, also completed his Registration Card during the first World War—although his status as an alien
born in “Germany” likely didn’t go over too well at the time, despite his
attempt at tempering the condition by qualifying himself as a “declared” alien.
(Nor have I been able to locate any such Declaration paperwork online, in
following up on that assertion.)
Still, these few documents do provide some clues to
encourage us. Michael’s Registration Card, for one thing, indicated the name of
his wife to be Mary. The card also provided his occupation—a cooper—which happens
to be the same occupation of his older brother, John Laskowski.
Best of all—just as had happened when the census enumerator
had stopped at Michael’s father’s household in Brooklyn
that year—for “place of birth” was indicated not the country, but the region
where Michael was born. And, like Antoni Laskowski before him, Michael was
apparently also born in the invaded region of Poland the Germans called Posen.
In other words, Michael was born in PoznaĆ.
I’d say we’ve found the right family.
Above: Excerpt from the 1920 United States Census, New York City borough of Brooklyn, on Bleecker Street; courtesy Ancestry.com.
Above: Excerpt from the 1920 United States Census, New York City borough of Brooklyn, on Bleecker Street; courtesy Ancestry.com.
Jacqi. I share your frustration with nicknames. When I spoke to my mother in law to gather information on her Italian family, everyone had a nickname & most had no relation to their actual name.
ReplyDeleteOh, Colleen, that would be frustrating, indeed!
DeleteI have no Italian relatives, so I never had to deal with that challenge, but working through this problem did call to mind the difficulty of reading certain Russian novels, with their constantly-changing names of characters.
The best part of this is - you found some really close (1st) cousins!
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely, Iggy! I'm elated! And you're right: these would be first cousins to my father...cousins I had no idea he had.
DeleteCousins!! :)
ReplyDeleteYes! As long as this is the right Michael and Mary, this is an exciting breakthrough.
Delete