The truth is, I’ve been running away from reality. And the
reality is that I’m not finding what I’m looking for.
Sometimes, it’s just easier to keep looking—looking for anything, as long as it keeps yielding
discoveries. Sometimes, getting more genealogical goodies feels like progress,
even if it isn’t the stuff I need to be finding.
If you haven’t noticed, it’s been almost a month since I was
last back on track with my stated purpose. Oh, granted, finding the how and why
of my connection to the Mayflower has
been a blast. But it wasn’t in my original game plan.
I still need to break through the brick wall of discovering
which family my orphaned second great grandmother belonged to. And, if I was
right about my original guess of Mary Rainey Broyles’ mother being Mary
Elizabeth Taliaferro Rainey, then who were her
parents? The genealogy books covering that line in that era, in my estimation,
have got it all wrong—but where is my proof that I’m any closer to the truth?
So, I dither around with finding “clues” to plug into other
family members’ trees and fool myself into thinking I’m making progress. I may
be gathering a larger count of individuals in my tree, but I’m still missing
the mark.
Remember, it’s all in seeking a connection between my
matrilineal line and that of the mystery adoptee who, one day several months
ago now, showed up on my digital front door, announcing that our DNA tests
showed an exact match we share.
Even where I’ve been stuck for the last month—wondering about
third great grandmother, Mary Elizabeth Taliaferro Rainey—I can’t gain any
traction. Not even with the four other Rainey daughters whose potential
descendants could also trace a line that would lead to exact matches, if I could
ever convince one of their descendants to agree to mitochondrial DNA testing.
If. Of course, that “if” won’t happen any time soon, because
I can’t even determine what became of three of those siblings of my second
great grandmother.
Don’t get your hopes up on the fourth of the sisters—I already
know she died unmarried before 1851.
However, if I can, somehow, find the “happily ever after”
for what must likely be the married version of sisters Martha, Sarah, and
Mildred Rainey—and if any of them had
daughters who had daughters—then perhaps I’ll find a way to see how close a
match we might have to our mystery cousin.
Above: Long Island, New York, artist William Moore Davis (1829-1920), The Lady Behind the Door; courtesy Wikipedia; in the public domain.
Above: Long Island, New York, artist William Moore Davis (1829-1920), The Lady Behind the Door; courtesy Wikipedia; in the public domain.
That painting is beautiful! And hopefully YOUR lady behind the "brick wall" comes out into view soon!
ReplyDeleteHey - do you know of any way to search your own family tree in Ancestry.com for "location" that they lived in? For instance, I know one of the 700 folks lived in St. Louis - but how do I find them?
I know Ancestry has lots of city directories...too bad they didn't print reverse directories back then!
DeletePerhaps this is not what you are looking for, but I know that, somewhere embedded in all the features in the One-Step Webpages, Steve Morse has included ways to search some census records by address. Iggy, with your knowledge of computers, you likely will be able to zoom in on exactly what you are seeking there--if it's available for your location and time period.
Ah. I found a way thanks to your motivation.
Deletehttp://www.tmgenealogy.com/2013/06/how-to-export-your-family-tree-from.html lets you export the tree to a GED file which can be opened in Notepad (or Word) and search with a simple "Find".
:)
Great! Thanks for sharing that link, Iggy. I wasn't sure exactly what you were looking for. Now that I've seen the site, I've used that same exporting process to move my tree over to Family Tree DNA to help others who are my genetic matches find the specifics on my tree.
DeleteKeep plugging away:)
ReplyDeleteSomehow, Far Side, with searches like these, you just gotta know they're somewhere out there...
Delete