Having a heritage that qualifies one to become a member of a
lineage society like Daughters of the American Revolution is an honor. Having
the ability to verify that bloodline is sometimes a challenge.
Take my maternal grandmother, for instance. I already know her
mother, Sarah Ann Broyles McClellan, has a family tree that leads straight back
to the documented patriot, Zachariah Taliaferro of Virginia.
Being able to connect
my grandmother to that heritage is a problem. Why? Because her birth
certificate—a delayed certificate, incidentally—gives her name as Rubie Broyles
McClellan. Yet her marriage certificate—if the one I’ve located is indeed hers
(I’m not yet fully convinced of that)—uses the name Ruth McClellan.
To complicate that issue, the person Rubie—or Ruth—chose to
marry was someone who also changed his name. Our Davis family Bible showed my grandfather’s
name as Roby Jake Davis. Yes, that’s how people from the hills of Tennessee sometimes
named their children. Perhaps as he grew up, my grandfather might have felt
that his name needed an adjustment to address some perceived expectation of
sophistication. Or perhaps it was just that proper Southern style of only using
one’s initials. Whichever it was, I saw that name morph from “R. J.,” as it
showed in the marriage index, to “J. R.,” as I knew him, myself. The “J” moved
from standing for “Jake” to representing “Jack.”
All that to say that now, I’m faced with the prospect of
convincing the D.A.R. powers that be that Rubie, daughter of Sarah Ann Broyles
McClellan, really grew up to be Ruth, who married Roby Jake, or R. J., who
really was the J. R. Davis whom everyone called Jack. See?
So I’m grabbing at anything that can possibly demonstrate
those things I know I know only
because I grew up with them. None of those people I knew from the family is
around to testify to the essence of what I’m trying to document.
Fortunately—though not quite to the extent of my husband’s
grandmother, Agnes Tully Stevens—my grandmother believed in saving everything. Well, nearly everything.
Enough to leave me scraps of evidence. Like a torn receipt from her request for
a copy of her marriage certificate from Bradley County, Tennessee. And her
delayed certificate of birth. These are just a few of the tokens of her
identity change over the years that may
come in handy, once I broach the subject with D.A.R. of whether my grandmother
really was who she said she was.
Now you see why that obituary, naming “Mrs. J. R. Davis”
as Sarah’s daughter, may be helpful. What is even better, though, is the big
picture of the letter from which I extracted those three newspaper clippings.
Apparently—though the letter is not addressed to anyone in particular—my grandmother
had sent a number of documents to someone, asking for their return after they
had served their purpose.
What could be the reason for her sending those clippings? My
guess is that she was following up on her aunt’s suggestion to “send $1.14 to
Dr. Montague Boyd for one those books on the Broyles.” You may remember that my
grandmother did, indeed, contact Dr. Boyd, who in reply sent her a follow-up questionnaire for a revision he was planning for his 1959 book on the Broyles,
Laffitte and Boyd families.
Whether he returned her certificates as she requested—he apparently
did return those three newspaper clippings—I don’t know. What I do realize,
though, is that, after all those years of signing her name as Mrs. J. R. Davis, my
grandmother somehow decided to sign her note to Dr. Boyd as simply “Rubie B. Davis.”
Please be so kind as to return to me these death notices of my parents, also the birth certificate of my daughter.Rubie B. Davis
And I thought my DAR situation was tricky. My registrar will be writing an analysis to prove Leonard Jr was the son of Leonard Sr since there is just nothing left to prove it by the preferred methods.
ReplyDeleteAren't you thankful for the advice of a registrar? How frustrating that you can't find anything more conclusive on your two Leonards, Wendy.
DeleteHow "stringent" do you think the DAR is? I mean, what you show would convince "most of us."
ReplyDeleteApparently, some forms of documentation are more equal than others, Iggy. I don't think newspaper clippings are as respected as other records. After all, you and I both know how often the newspapers can get the record wrong.
Delete