As a sufferer of the “ooh, shiny” syndrome, I often need an
alibi for the embarrassing symptoms of my malady. Today, I’ll blame it all on an ink blot.
I’ve been puzzling over how to handle tracing my Tully line
back in time from Chicago to Ontario
and ultimately all the way to Ireland.
You certainly understand how difficult it can be, having to research names like
John or Mary in a place like Ireland.
I decided my strategy would be to piggy back on the vehicle
of a relative with a more unusual name. I found that name, literally, under an
ink blot in the Canada West census for 1852.
There, just eighteen scant lines below my Denis Tully family
in Paris, Ontario,
was a Flannery family.
You may recall that I had discovered—almost accidentally—that
Denis’ wife, listed as “Mrs.” in the 1852 census, was actually born Margaret Flannery. As you can imagine, any Flannery family living this close to my Tully
family—especially so far from their original home—would be of great interest to me.
And it was. Except that I couldn’t read the given name of
the head of that Flannery household. It looked like “Edman.” Or, possibly, that “m” was actually a “w” and the man’s name—but for the slip of a letter—could have
been Edward. I couldn’t really be sure, because right in the middle of the
name, census enumerator John Sinclair’s otherwise stellar handwriting was
besmirched by an errant ink blot.
Without the corresponding wife’s name to serve as an
alternate guide to the parents’ generation, I was left with the names of his four
sons to obtain hints about how to research this family. When I took a serious
look at those sons’ names—seeing the usual Irish lineup in offerings such as
John and Patrick—I was about to despair of finding a way back to the Emerald
Isle.
Until, that is, I found Cornelius. That, I thought, was a
name I could grab and run with.
I ran in both directions—seeing, first, if I could snag any
early returns from a foray into Irish documents, then reversing gears and
looking forward in time, attempting to locate any descendants. While the peek
into Irish records yielded some promising results, seeking more recent Canadian
records left me clueless. Apparently, Cornelius Flannery is not as rare a name
as I had at first presumed.
The questions occurring, thanks to that small experiment,
make me wonder about the possibility that Cornelius and his Flannery kin left
Canada for cities south of the border in either Detroit—as had their Tully
cousin, Michael—or in Chicago, along with John Tully’s family.
In the guinea-pig spirit in which this blog was first
launched, I’ll share the beginnings of my foray into hypothesis testing
tomorrow, when I check the possibilities found in both those state-side
locations.
Thank-goodness for one Cornelius. As for "Mrs" Flannery -- hrmph. Sleuth on without apology!
ReplyDeleteSomehow, this Canadian census finding with only "Mrs." seems more egregious than the proper Southern rendition of "Mrs. E. J. Flannery." Yes, I'll take my Cornelius without any objections!
DeleteI think the inkblot name is Edmun (or perhaps Edman).
ReplyDeletehttp://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~canon/archives/news-essexfreepress-deaths-1895.txt tells of a Patrick Flannery being found in a MIll Race. (1/3 down).
http://ontariocensus.rootsweb.ancestry.com/transcripts/1851/254-index.html slaims his name was Edman - but it would be unusual.
Thanks for finding those links, Iggy. The story of Patrick Flannery is a good lead. I'm actually gathering documents to spin a post off of this in a few days.
DeleteAnd yes, Edmun is closer to reality. I've found other sources :)
Ink blots, oh no, one more of those obstacles genealogists have to content with. Hope your idea to use Cornelius to get around this works.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Colleen, I'm hoping so, too!
DeleteI will guess Edmund..and a census taker who could not spell.
ReplyDeleteWhen it comes to census takers who cannot spell, wait 'til we get to Cornelius! ;)
Delete