Sometimes, the only solution to a family history dilemma is
to go back to the source—in this case, the City of Fort Wayne.
Of course, I don’t mean right now (despite the fact I’d love to be there on this opening day of the Federation of Genealogical Societies 2013 Conference).
But I do mean at some point. No matter how huge a wealth of
material you may find online to help round out your genealogical research, you
simply must include a trip to the geographic location the family had, at one
time, called home.
Our family did this several years ago. Of course, we had the
added benefit of doing our legwork in a city that boasts the second largest genealogical reference collection on the continent. Even so, we spent
our fair share of hours out in the summer sunshine, scoping out cemetery plots
and mapping where each branch of the family had moved in the city as their
economic wellbeing improved.
Now, as I struggle over why there were two puzzling newspaper
entries involving a John Kelly Stevens on the city’s police force which clearly
didn’t apply to our family’s ancestor, I recall the “loot” I brought home
from that research trip to Fort Wayne, years ago.
Last night, I pulled out some of those files. I was thinking of
a specific photocopy that might come in handy in my name quandary. The
page itself is a number-coded list of names corresponding to a montage of
portraits of city officials, up to and including each of the city’s patrolmen.
The portraits, as well as the composite display, were done
by The Miner Studio. Unfortunately, the material is not dated, but the addition
of the photographer’s credit helps somewhat to affix a more limited date range
to the collection. According to “Directory of Fort Wayne
Photographers 1843-1930” by John D. Beatty, readily available as a PDF file at the Genealogy Center, Charles Winslow Miner was the
proprietor of the studio. The article, arranged in alphabetical order by each
photographer’s surname, provides a brief history of this particular photographer on page
eleven. Though he arrived in Fort
Wayne in the 1890s and opened his first studio with a
partner in 1894, he didn’t remove his partner’s name from the business signage
until 1909.
His tenure as sole proprietor was short-lived, as Charles
Miner died on May 22, 1912. According to the Bulletin of Photography, volume ten, number 253, on June 12 of that
same year, it was mentioned in the “News and Notes” section that his wife had “assumed
control” of the studio “owing to the death of her husband.” Along with the help
of “Miss Estella Miner,” presumably his daughter, the enterprise continued in
operation under the direction of Charles’ long-time assistant, John D. Albrecht.
The Beatty report asserted the business remained in
operation through 1916, though under the hand of someone else—“Japanese-born
Henry Y. Ozaki”—who nevertheless didn’t change the business name until 1916.
All that leaves us with a possible date range of 1909
to 1916 for the list in my possession. Not quite the precise pinpoint I
was hoping for, but ’twill do in a pinch.
Another hint for the date of the listing, however, is
provided by the text added under the photographs. Above the
entry, “Photo By The Miner Studio,” are three names of significance:
- Dayton F. Abbott, Chief of Police
- Martin A. Rundell, Captain of Police
- George F. Eisenhut, Lieutenant of Police
My first inclination was to Google™ the name of the police
chief. I did that, but could only assume that politics had done to his career
in the major what it had done in the minor for John Kelly Stevens’ own position
as sergeant. Dayton Franklin Abbott apparently was called to serve in 1911,
then was out for one mayor’s term from 1914 through 1918, then in again with a change of mayors beginning
in 1918. All that—and a transcription of a biographical sketch from volume five
of Indiana:
One Hundred and Fifty Years of American Development by Charles Roll in 1931—if
you care to scroll down to the fifth listing on a web page here. Oh, and a
little picture here.
Jiving Chief Abbott’s tenure with that of The Miner Studio—why
do I feel like I’m doing Venn diagrams instead of genealogy here?—leaves us
with a possible date range of 1911 through 1914—not much better than what we
had before.
Of course, there is one other option: check the city
directories. Those of you who are subscribers to genealogy services such as
Ancestry.com are already familiar with the fact that they provide scanned
copies of such directories. For those of you wishing to search on the cheap,
though, never forget the wonders a good tour of duty via Google™ can provide
you. That is how I uncovered copies of the Fort Wayne directories at Archive.org for the
years 1912 and 1918. Admittedly, those were not precisely the years I had scientifically isolated through Venn
diagram wizardry above. But give me a break: they were close.
If you take a look at the 1918 directory here, you can see
right away that we can dismiss this year as a possibility. While Dayton Abbott
was again listed as Chief—as we had seen from his biographical sketch—the
1918 directory had elevated George Eisenhut to the position of Captain. As can
be surmised from the thick political atmosphere we’ve observed elsewhere in
this study of Fort Wayne
history, Captain Eisenhut most likely attained that status upon the change in
political flavors at the last election. In other words, since the preceding mayor’s term
was from 1914 to 1918, we can safely say these appointments were timed with that
change in office.
The 1912 directory, however—as you can see for yourself here—handily
provides the exact same listing as that gleaned from the photocopy that got me
started on this subject in the first place. And, as a bonus, that particular
volume of the directory listed not only the department brass, but also the
entire roster of patrolmen for that year as well—including “John K. Stevens.”
And yes, I did compare all the names. If you are wondering:
no, they aren’t exactly the same. For one thing, Patrolman Louis Crawley
advanced from Patrolman to Sergeant—or, perhaps, in the reverse, as we’ve seen that change in rank was
easily a two way street back then, providing no mechanism to help us fix the
photo list’s date any more precisely. We’ll have to be happy with 1912—give or
take a year or two—as our working date.
What that list gives me, though, is confirmation that both
for the 1912 directory and for this
contemporary roster of the police department, there was only one John Kelly
Stevens.
So whichever reporter got the story wrong—whether for that
birth announcement in 1904 or that death report in 1919—couldn’t have claimed a
case of mistaken identity. There was only one
John Kelly Stevens working for the Fort
Wayne police force back then.
Whew! Bumbling journalists! :)
ReplyDeleteWell, at least it impressed upon me the advice to never believe anything...until you check it out for yourself!
DeleteI wonder if there is a "retraction" or "correction" notice for these two stories (the birth of the daughter and the death of the mother) hidden away in a subsequent issue.
ReplyDeleteI hope to find time to see if the "other John Kelly Stevens of Columbus" might have been the root-cause of these errors.
You had an interesting theory on that, Iggy. That was part of what got me checking lists. I did take a look at directories for Fort Wayne, and it appears there is another John Stephens--which, as we've already seen, can easily morph into Stevens.
DeleteThe retraction idea is plausible, too, although I wonder how much care some smaller newspapers took to publicly correct their mistakes. More likely, John Kelly got a good ribbing for the day, and it was promptly forgotten after that.