As much as we in the genealogy community prefer to see ourselves as lone researchers on a trailblazing quest to locate heretofore undiscovered ancestors, with the advent of the Internet—and again, as the world of social media collides with our ivory tower self-images—we have really morphed into participants in one giant ongoing genealogy conversation.
There are so many tools to help us accomplish this feat. We’ve
connected with genealogy bloggers—two thousand eight hundred of them and
counting, according to Thomas MacEntee of GeneaBloggers—through RSS feeds, Blogspot’s
Google Friend Connect, and email subscription services. We’ve Tweeted each
other about #genealogy and #familyhistory on Twitter. We’ve found each other’s
Facebook pages—especially for online interest groups like Chicago Genealogy or actual
brick-and-mortar organizations like the Marion County Arkansas Heritage Society.
We used to congregate in places like Rootsweb and GenForum. But as we journey far past our humble online origins, we
tend to forget—or discard—those original forums where we made our first digital
genealogy connections (as Deb Ruth mentioned just yesterday in her own blog). As services like GeoCities exploded and people learned
how to develop those first rudimentary websites to share their research
results, genealogy resources multiplied.
In fact, back in those early days, the burgeoning online
growth of genealogy sites was creating a problem of its own: how to find things
in that maze of research information.
One woman, planning to speak at her local Genealogy Society
meeting about some helpful links she had found, brought a one-page handout to
share with her group’s members. Everyone raved about the list, and others asked
her to share it. Eventually, the easiest way for her to answer the many
requests for “more!” was to put the list online.
That was in 1996.
The list has mushroomed since then, and it's still online. We
know it as Cyndi’s List.
I’ve benefited from the links I’ve found on Cyndi’s List
over and over again. It’s a resource I’ve known about for years.
I've even blogged about it.
I've even blogged about it.
And yet, as more and more resources for genealogy research
come online each passing year, the new and shiny seems to push these
tried-and-true resources away from the forefront of our attention.
I was reminded of that just this week. I was stymied by a
research problem and, putting my mind in neutral rather than continuing to spin
my wheels, I switched over to Google and just entered the term, “genealogy
blogs.”
I’m not quite sure what I expected. Of course, I knew I’d
see the standard entries such as GeneaBloggers. I was hoping I’d see some
titles I’d not yet stumbled upon, too.
I totally didn’t expect to see the entry for Cyndi’s List.
Surprise, surprise, the old faithful Big Box of Lists now has a category called Blogs for Genealogy. And like any enormous all-inclusive
list, this website invites visitors to submit any links that aren’t already on
their list.
Operating on that age-old advice—“You have a mouth; now use
it”—that’s exactly what I did.
Not that I’m anyone special. Any genealogy blogger can avail
himself or herself of that same opportunity. Which I hope many will. The more
ways we can utilize to find each other, the better for all of us.
The happily-ever-after part of the story is that, within
twenty four hours, Cyndi’s List accepted my entry, and I am now a proud part of
the listing for genealogy blogs on her website. My shining fifteen minutes of
fame there came yesterday with a mention on the top of her daily “What’s New”
listing. And like the faithful returns from any good investment, from this time
forward, I know it will be one more way to help connect those proverbial
haystack-searchers with the missing needle they are seeking.
I've found myself doing exactly the same thing, forgetting the older, but still useful sites. Then a light bulb goes on...
ReplyDeleteOf course, those older sites will only remain useful as long as lots of people keep going back there. Almost a Catch-22...
DeleteThanks for this. I had no idea I could submit a link to Cyndi's list. I don't use it (I find it a bit overwhelming), but I know plenty of others who do.
ReplyDeleteJessica, when I use it, I stick to the old basics, mostly looking at geographical designations, or specific services like vital statistics. You're right--it seems like there is too much stuff there! But you can search Cyndi's List using the site-based Google search box if the category lists get overwhelming.
DeleteAlways nice to have "another tool" in the toolbox when the ones you're working with...just don't seem to be working.
ReplyDeleteEven if they are working, Iggy, it never hurts to have another tool. Different crowds seem to aggregate at different gathering places, but if we learn to connect with all these other places, we open up more horizons. I like that.
Delete