Let’s see: I know the names of two people labeled in my Tully
line as cousins: the priest John Bernard Davidson, and one of the many in this
family called Patrick. Both of these men descend from the Michael and Margaret
Tully showing on the same 1861 Canadian census page as the patriarch (so far)
of my husband’s Tully line, Denis Tully. Can I connect these lines, and add all
the material I’ve uncovered on Michael’s descendants to my database?
Not yet.
How frustrating. I’ve already got a list of Michael and
Margaret’s entire roster of children’s names and birth years—there were six, of
whom only two survived by the time of the 1900 census.
I’ve found their daughter Margaret and her husband, Robert T.
Davidson—whom she married November 24, 1897, in Chicago—showing in the 1900 census with her mother, and, widowed, in the 1920 census with her brother Patrick just before her death that July. I’ve
located the three Davidson children, including the priest, Father John (who
evidently died in 1983, still in Chicago),
and John’s sister Margaret, who married the “Rory” Hill showing in the
household for that 1920 census. I’ve followed that Margaret’s line down for
another two generations.
I’ve done due diligence on Margaret Tully Davidson’s brother’s
line, too. While Patrick’s line is considerably shorter—he and his wife Carrie
had only one surviving child—I was able to locate their daughter in census
records from her parents’ household in 1900, to her marriage in 1912 and
ensuing census records in 1920, 1930 and 1940. All that, despite a scramble of
documentation under the name Margaret, Margaret Maud, and Maude M—with a
husband alternately referred to as Achille Mailhot and its spelling variant
Achilles, and his nickname, Archie.
As maddening as it is to have sketched out an entire branch
potentially ready-made to plug into my Tully line, I just need more
documentation to verify that these people are, indeed, descended from the right individual. After all,
isn’t this the family with a kazillion Margarets? Can I even be sure about a
line with multiple Patricks? How can I be sure this isn’t just a neighborly
coincidence?
And so I end up, as I have before, with lines of descendants
streaming from a mystery person—someone I have a hunch belongs to me, courtesy
of hearsay and labels such as “my cousin” but for whom I can find no official
documentation.
I’ve had that same thing happen to my Flanagan line.
Remember William Flanagan, the old man with the impressive monument at the Chicago cemetery that
became his final resting place? The one who started out in “Parish Ballygran”
in Ireland's County Limerick,
but was unceremoniously awarded one-way transportation to Australia, yet ended up in Chicago? Somewhere along that line, I
stumbled upon a mention of “his niece” Johanna Lee—and successfully pursued
research on her line. In the end, though, I had to stop, not knowing where or
how to plug what I found into the overarching family scheme.
So these disembodied branches of family exist. Detached from any
connection to the larger design, the records lie in a box somewhere, pages of
scribbled notes hastily sketching the connection for future reference. But
somehow, still remaining detached.
It feels maddening to have these detached generations.
Unable to attach them in their rightful place, I feel as if they run the risk
of being forever forgotten. Yet, with the right documentation, they could be
safely tucked in their spot so everyone would have the relief of knowing the
connection.
The documentation is not always there, though. As rapidly as
online sites are adding digitization of archives through scans and
transcriptions, there is still so much not accessible online. I’m an old hand
at trawling through microfilms and dusty archives, but I’ve found that
sometimes, those resources aren’t even available. There is so much of private
records that still remains, well, private.
And so, I wait. I spread the word, myself, hoping somehow
the search engines will make my small piece of the puzzle more visible. I put
out the feelers that tentatively ask for consideration—to collaborate, to share
documentation—but then, all I can do is hope that somehow, this brick wall
will, one day, tumble down like all the others.
And this Margaret and this Patrick—and yes, even the
long-separated Johanna—will be entitled to claim their place.
I share your frustration, Jacqi, for the exciting lift of finding a piece to the scattered puzzle, only to doubt the existance of the final documentation that could verify the "feeling" of "I've found Him/Her"! So many times I have been so sure, but hesitated to finalize the placement, so they rest somewhere in Limbo in my database, awaiting the moment when some unexplainable documentation or researcher turns up out of nowhere. It will happen, stay positive, and keep searching1
ReplyDelete