The scary thing about finishing a series—at least for this
genealogy blogger—is encountering that great gap of The Unknown into which the
writer tumbles.
I’ve just finished tracing a viable route from my husband’s Ohio family back to an
ancestor qualifying for First Families of Ohio status by virtue of arrival in
the state before 1821. Nicholas Schneider—soon to be recorded as “Snider”—proved
to be our man, and I am drawing up the paperwork so I can get our completed
packet in the mail well before the deadline.
In the midst of that paperwork journey, I uncovered an
interesting side note: Nicholas’ daughter-in-law—the one whose marriage record
left me in doubt over her actual maiden name—may very well have also qualified
as First Families of Ohio material.
That isn’t all. Miss Nancy Ann Jackson-or-is-it-Johnson may
also lead to D. A. R. membership for any of the women in my husband’s family
who cares to pursue the application.
Of course, this isn’t something I can rustle up at a moment’s
notice. Just that little slip of the pen while the clerk filled out the Sniders’
marriage license back in 1841 will cause me extra documentation steps.
Even after sorting out that paperwork error, this pursuit
will take me some research time. The problem is: once a genealogy aficionado
commits to blogging about her research discoveries, there is an instant switch
in the status of all available time: presto, change-o, suddenly all spare time
is consumed with writing about what
has already been discovered, leaving
precious little time to pursue further research.
So, once again, dear guinea pig reader, I beg your
patience as I take you on my next research journey: the quest to connect Simon Snider’s wife, (possibly) the former Nancy Ann Jackson, to a Revolutionary War
Patriot. The quest, of course, will take some time, for I’ve never been this
way before. Not being clairvoyant, I can’t foresee any pitfalls in this
trailblazing journey. I can’t predict that I’ll even make my goal. I can only
promise that, like a faithful guide, I’ll report what I see as I see it, and
hope that we won’t miss any significant hints or warnings along the way.
In the meantime, let’s settle this niggling doubt about just
what Nancy Ann’s maiden name was. We’ve already seen that the marriage record
is of no help whatsoever. That document alone provides us a fifty-fifty chance
of being wrong in our assumptions,
which would never do.
There’s got to be some other way to verify her maiden name
other than that erroneous 1841 record. Our quandary is that there are precious
few other governmental documents kept at that time. There are church records,
of course, but that introduces the tedium of having to rely not only on snail
mail—anathema to most of us now spoiled with instant digital communication
methods—but also on the good graces of the keepers of whatever archives are
still extant in the local diocese.
However, if we are willing to bide our time until an era when
governmental records stepped up to the plate and provided the kind of details
we genealogy researchers prefer, we do have many ways to get around that 1841
clerical error that has me stymied. Let’s call those many ways “children.”
Nancy Ann and her husband, Simon Snider, were the proud
parents of at least fourteen children. Of those children who lived past the
date in which government agencies began collecting additional information on death
records, we have several whose own death records report mother’s maiden name.
Now, you know how iffy death records can be—and can you
blame bereaved family members for making reporting mistakes in the midst of
such loss?—but I’d still like to say that these additional documents should be
keepers for our paper trail.
Let’s take a look at what we can find, right now, online, as
far as scanned and transcribed documents go.
Of Simon and Nancy’s
children who died after, say 1905, I can immediately locate digitized records
for two of them. Sarah Rebecca, who married John Overmyer, died in Ohio in 1935—a date sure
to include all the information we’d be seeking. Her sister Emily Catherine Gordon—the one included in my husband’s direct line—passed much earlier, in 1915,
but her Ohio
record includes what we want, too.
Nicholas, one of the Snider children who emigrated from Ohio, was a bit more
challenging to find. He moved to Iowa, but
evidently died in Minnesota.
Though the search for his record was more difficult—thanks to transcription
issues listing him with the improbable spellings of “Nicholi,” “Nicholis” and “Nichols,”
in addition to the alternate surname spelling of Snyder—the 1925 record still
shows the mother’s maiden name we want, despite other obvious reporting errors. And his younger brother, Robert James Snider, dying in West Virginia in 1933, also provides a transcribed record.
Each of these four records shows the mother’s maiden name
reported as Jackson.
Not one mentions Johnson as the correct name.
Of course, there is the possibility that these are
coincidentally the four out of fourteen that were in total error. I’ll grant
that possibility. Yet there is simply not much more that can be done in recouping
those records of the children who died prior to the more complete capture of
personal information on civil records. And of those other children whose later death
certificates I’ve yet to locate, I’ll do my due diligence to keep my eye open
for any threatened Johnson surnames encroaching upon those governmental
records.
Step one—confirming that we are talking about Nancy Ann Jackson and not Nancy Johnson—completed.
Now we can delve into the slow process of determining what
happened in the generation that preceded Nancy—for
we will encounter our next road hazard warning at this upcoming bend in the
ancestral trail.
Above right: Edmund Leighton, "Til Death Do Us Part," oil on canvas, 1878; courtesy Wikipedia; in the public domain.
My problem is just been the opposite. I love doing the research, but I don't write it down and document it until later sometimes. Hopefully this is changing. I'm doing a lot more writing now.
ReplyDeleteActually as I reread your blog, I am doing the same thing; "writing about what has already been done." This leaves "little time to pursue further research." It is a balancing act, and one I'm not very good at.
ReplyDeleteGrant, I'm a firm believer in that old saw, "Practice makes perfect"--almost. With time, and in making the miniscule adjustments that come with the learning experience, you'll get better at that balancing act. I'm working on that same thing, myself. In the meantime, I'm totally open to having everyone come along for the journey, and journaling each step of the researching way as we take it. That way, I get to have my cake and eat it, too. :)
DeleteLooks like the adventure is about to begin:)
ReplyDeleteThere's always another one, isn't there?!
DeletePerhaps Nancy Jackson married a Mr. Johnson and then later a Snider (take-a-youse-pick for the spellin').
ReplyDeleteThat could cause this sort of confusion too...
I've seen that sort of scenario before. I'll tuck that possibility in the back of my mind for this case, too, but I'm getting convinced that it really was Jackson--and that the courthouse clerk really was out to lunch!
Delete