Saturday, March 4, 2017

Now Indexing:
Adding to the Collection


For every ancestor whose descendants claim, "My surname got changed at Ellis Island," there is likely a naturalization document showing just the way it really was, back in 1901 or 1893. And the more of those other records we can get online, the better it will be for all of us who are seeking the real truth of the matter.

Last night, during one of my regular indexing sessions, I had the opportunity to add to those digitized records by transcribing the pertinent data so that it can be searchable by computer. I had elected to index some records from the collection at FamilySearch.org called Illinois Naturalization Records, 1837 to 1988.

Thankfully, the dates that came up on my batch of ten records happened to fall within the relatively recent time period of 1936 through 1939. That meant, rather than have to squint and slog through chicken scratch handwriting or ambiguous entries, I got to transcribe forms that were almost all typewritten—a welcome change, believe me.

In addition, though the indexing process required me to extract specific elements from the various naturalization forms in the collection, I could easily see that there was a wealth of additional information included on those forms. I could just imagine a descendant, searching through this collection, ecstatic at the surprise of "stumbling" upon more information than originally hoped for, all because of taking the time to click through to the original image, rather than just gleaning the few facts included in the indexed portion.

Many of the records I indexed were from East Saint Louis. The ethnic origins ranged from Spain to Turkey, including displaced Armenians. Because of the time period, I also encountered the after-effect of that awkward span of U.S. history when American women who married immigrants here suddenly lost their citizenship in their own land—and after the change in laws, actually had to apply to once again become an American citizen.

While I admit I do more than my fair share of grumbling about indexing those more difficult to read documents, this round of indexing went through like a breeze. In fact, I was able to double up on the amount I usually do, thanks to the ease of handling this collection.

More important than my own comfort with the process is the fact that somewhere, eventually, someone will find any one of those documents, realize it is an ancestor's record, and find enough information to help them break through a brick wall, learn a wife's name, or discover a birth city in the family's land of origin. And I'm all for spreading cheer like that.



Above: "Spring blossoms," oil on panel by Austrian impressionist artist Olga Wisinger-Florian (1844 - 1926); courtesy Wikipedia; in the public domain.


4 comments:

  1. Jacqi, Thank you for indexing! This is so important to the community of family history researchers. Just want you to know you're appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Marian. Since I only do a small part of all that's needed to be indexed, what I'm hoping is that others will be inspired to do their own small part. It really doesn't take much time, but adds up, if done regularly.

      Besides, if each of us gets a few others to help--and then they get a few others to help, too--it will eventually multiply into a sizeable shift in all the records which will be available for researchers. Many hands...

      Delete
  2. Yes exactly! I should do more there, thank you for what you do! :)
    I had a good week papers arrived about my husbands family history back to 1747 in England. Someday I will have to verify all the info I suggested that he do it...he was not too interested, I even suggested he update it to the present...:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How exciting to receive papers on family history! Especially when you connect with a researcher willing to share and collaborate. And yes, hopefully, he will update it to the present--an important addition!

      Delete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...